Re: CGG, labels

[tb]

> Also going to completely different colored labels would only serve to confuse and

> annoy people. We are looking at changing the label somewhat, and if we do it

> will be done soon before large amounts are graded. Suggestions are always

> welcome.

 

This is the main area where CGC falls short. I'd recommend that you only have

one label color/design with a new field for listing restoration. CGC's current binary

distinction between restored and unrestored books does not make sense :

there is a blurry spectrum between the two extremes. Instead, I'd like a new,

clearly separated field which lists all restoration work. There are many ways this

restoration field could be designed (a list, a table with numerical grades, ...), but

it needs to be there IMO. The purple label was a fundamental mistake and the

sooner it disappears the better.