scan working please grade My Hawkman #1

[topofthetotem]

Post deleted by topofthetotem

[Aces]

First attachment I've seen as a red X!?

[divad]

First attachment I've seen as a red X!?

 

Definitely a 10.0 then

[Aces]

First attachment I've seen as a red X!?

 

Definitely a 10.0 then

 

Must be the new system?

[topofthetotem]

I'll try again

[topofthetotem]

so I got this book back from cgc so let see how you compare with the cgc boys I post the cgc scan after we get a few grades in

[Forbush-Man]

VG/NM 4.9

 

 

[topofthetotem]

VG/NM 4.9

 

 

 

hotter hotter colder colder cold freezing

[Forbush-Man]

VG/NM 4.9

 

 

 

hotter hotter colder colder cold freezing

 

[Forbush-Man]

I'll try again

 

4.0/4.5

 

Is that more better?!?

 

 

 

[topofthetotem]

I'll try again

 

4.0/4.5

 

Is that more better?!?

 

 

 

 

Close but your way off

[Forbush-Man]

I'll try again

 

4.0/4.5

 

Is that more better?!?

 

 

 

 

Close but your way off

 

Then I'm going with my initial VG/NM "gut-feeling"!

 

 

[topofthetotem]

VG/NM

[Forbush-Man]

Okay,.....VG/F,.....but that's the BEST you're getting from me!

 

[Aces]

5.0

[Forbush-Man]

5.0

 

"Johnny- come lately"!!!

[Comicdey]

5.0

[topofthetotem]

I know this is a little unfair with no BC scan but I'll tell you it is a clean flat copy, very crisp! with great PQ only defects are the spine stresses and some corner blunting! I'll post the cgc scan later

It was advertised as vf/nm but there was a good quality scan and it did not look like a VF/NM to me so I did not bid even close to VF/NM. When I got it in hand I thought it was more like a 7.5 before I sent it to cgc.

[nik]

If you got anything higher than a 6.0, consider yourself lucky.

[topofthetotem]

I think my original scan is not that good quality wise but it looks nicer in person