• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

PGM Sgt. Fury 34
4 4

9 posts in this topic

Hmmm..really thought this would rate higher. Is it the spine tics, which seem minor to me, that are dragging it down from an 8.0?

It was advertised as a 9.0, which I realized it wasn't, but thought it was an 8.0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/4/2022 at 10:42 AM, Bayowolf said:

Hmmm..really thought this would rate higher. Is it the spine tics, which seem minor to me, that are dragging it down from an 8.0?

It was advertised as a 9.0, which I realized it wasn't, but thought it was an 8.0.

For me it was the color-breaking spine ticks and top edge wear along with the aging of the cover and resulting discoloration. 8.0 isn't beyond reason with how CGC seems to be grading nowadays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
4 4