87richarm Posted July 4 Share Posted July 4 (edited) Hi all, Just to add to some of the inconsistencies by cgc here is a little story. Late last year I bought a batman 10 on a live sale. Being Sold as a 1.8-2.0 no restoration (i specifically asked). Something seemed off with the back cover when I saw it, but the app has a great refund policy. So I took the gamble. I received it and the back cover was for the wrong book (not married but for a silver age book instead) I also noticed glue, tape and possible colour touch. I worked with the seller on a partial refund (they were difficult to work with even though it was clearly not a 1.8- 2.0). I also found an auction listing for this same book that sold 4 months prior. The listing had it as a 0.5 with all the issues listed (photo below) I sold it listing all the defects and I told buyer I'd take the back cover off and slab it to try to just get a blue 0.5. The buyer did not and submitted as is. It came back as a 1.8 green label. And the reason it was qualified by cgc is the bottom staple was replaced. No mention of the wrong back cover, glue, tape, or colour touch. What happened here? Edited July 4 by 87richarm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sauce Dog Posted July 4 Share Posted July 4 Why blank out the serial number so we can't even see the grader notes? Uff_Da 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buttock Posted July 4 Share Posted July 4 On 7/4/2024 at 12:21 PM, Sauce Dog said: Why blank out the serial number so we can't even see the grader notes? Yeah. Let us see the SN and get @CGC Mike to check into the back cover issue. Sauce Dog 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87richarm Posted July 4 Author Share Posted July 4 On 7/4/2024 at 2:21 PM, Sauce Dog said: Why blank out the serial number so we can't even see the grader notes? Sorry not my book. So didn't want to disclose too much. Photos of graders notes below as well of the back cover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revat Posted July 4 Share Posted July 4 What did cgc do when they were notified of the mistake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buttock Posted July 4 Share Posted July 4 On 7/4/2024 at 2:29 PM, 87richarm said: Sorry not my book. So didn't want to disclose too much. Photos of graders notes below as well of the back cover Jeez, that's the back cover and part of the front of a Coo Coo comic I think. Egregious mistake. Sauce Dog, vheflin, Artifiction and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87richarm Posted July 4 Author Share Posted July 4 On 7/4/2024 at 5:06 PM, buttock said: Jeez, that's the back cover and part of the front of a Coo Coo comic I think. Egregious mistake. Wow you are correct sir... I always wondered what it was from. I have never really seen coo coo comics. But here it is KCOComics 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator CGC Mike Posted July 5 Administrator Share Posted July 5 Hi I have passed this along to the team. Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
