• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

1ST Appearence or 1st issue comic ?

Started by speeder-migration,

44 posts in this topic

Theagenes

Theagenes

Posted
Posted

In this case both her 1st and 2nd appearance (Conan 23 and 24) are far more desirable than Red Sonja #1. Of course her 3rd appearance is even more desirable than those two, since it was SSOC #1 smile.gif

 

Also, don't forget her first solo book was Marvel Feature #1, which predates RS #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blowout

blowout

Posted
Posted
The first full appearence of Galactus is worh so much more than the 1st brief appearence,or not

 

It is the first full appearence of the Silver Surfer in FF 48 that makes it more valuable than FF 49, nothing to do with Galactus. So not a good example.

 

The previously illustrated ASM 299 vs 300 and Hulk 180 vs 181 are much better examples of how the market treats full appearances vs brief ones. 893scratchchin-thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
B-Smooth

B-Smooth

Posted
Posted

we need to form a commitee for the "Rights of hulk 180 and ASM 299." We can spread the word to all of the collectors and non collectors and possibly get them to change their minds about the TRUE first appearance of these characters. This is after we buy up all the 180's and 299's we can find! devil.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blowout

blowout

Posted
Posted
we need to form a commitee for the "Rights of hulk 180 and ASM 299." We can spread the word to all of the collectors and non collectors and possibly get them to change their minds about the TRUE first appearance of these characters.

 

There is no doubt that the characters first appeared in these issues, but we are only talking one panel. So it really is only an image, almost an advert really, rather than the characters themselves. 893scratchchin-thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
deathlok

deathlok

Posted
Posted
we need to form a commitee for the "Rights of hulk 180 and ASM 299." We can spread the word to all of the collectors and non collectors and possibly get them to change their minds about the TRUE first appearance of these characters.

 

There is no doubt that the characters first appeared in these issues, but we are only talking one panel. So it really is only an image, almost an advert really, rather than the characters themselves. 893scratchchin-thumb.gif

hence why we distinguish between "brief appearance" and "full appearance." Not really a difficult concept to understand.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stronguy

Stronguy

Posted
Posted
we need to form a commitee for the "Rights of hulk 180 and ASM 299." We can spread the word to all of the collectors and non collectors and possibly get them to change their minds about the TRUE first appearance of these characters. This is after we buy up all the 180's and 299's we can find! devil.gif

 

So you got no love for Web Of Spider-Man #18 -- the true 1st appearance of Venom?

 

Hater! sumo.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
B-Smooth

B-Smooth

Posted
Posted
we need to form a commitee for the "Rights of hulk 180 and ASM 299." We can spread the word to all of the collectors and non collectors and possibly get them to change their minds about the TRUE first appearance of these characters.

 

There is no doubt that the characters first appeared in these issues, but we are only talking one panel. So it really is only an image, almost an advert really, rather than the characters themselves. 893scratchchin-thumb.gif

hence why we distinguish between "brief appearance" and "full appearance." Not really a difficult concept to understand.

 

Neither is trolling Timulty. tongue.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing