PGM WEIRD FANTASY 16

[-cryptkeeper-]

my first original EC bought 20 years ago

 

 

 

[Point Five]

Straight-up 4.0 is my guess, possible 4.5... As with your other books, larger scans are really needed to give you an accurate answer (no offense).

 

Nice to see your first EC...and it looks a heck of a lot better than my first EC. Always loved this cover!

[KingOfRulers]

Same problem as last time. I can get a big scan. Looks to be a 3.5 from here though.

[marvelcollector]

A 3.5 if that's tape on the BC..if not a 4.0.

scans do need to be a bit larger....

[divad]

A 3.5 if that's tape on the BC..if not a 4.0.

scans do need to be a bit larger....

 

One thousand one . . . .

[KingOfRulers]

A 3.5 if that's tape on the BC..if not a 4.0.

scans do need to be a bit larger....

 

I thought you were going to go higher on this one. I saw your 3.5 grade for the House of Secrets #92, and thought it was a bit high. You think that the House of Secrets #92 is equal in condition to this Weird Fantasy #16?

 

Just asking.

[marvelcollector]

A 3.5 if that's tape on the BC..if not a 4.0.

scans do need to be a bit larger....

 

I thought you were going to go higher on this one. I saw your 3.5 grade for the House of Secrets #92, and thought it was a bit high. You think that the House of Secrets #92 is equal in condition to this Weird Fantasy #16?

 

Just asking.

 

I'm sticking to the 3.5 on the HOS 92..but I see your point....

 

I think this book (the Weird Fantasy) has two major flaws - the LRFC crease and the tape - while the HOS has an accumalation of smaller flaws. (The disparity in scan size is a bit of a hinderance too.)

 

I think technically they're the same grade, but the Weird Fantasy does appear to have better eye appeal...