could you tell me what you think?

[Monstro]

never submitted before. thinking of sending a few.

possibly this one.and if you don't mind i'm gonna post a few more.

thanks!

 

[KingOfRulers]

, Gil Kane and his nostril shot covers.

 

What's the back cover like. I'd say a 9.2 just from the front.

[divad]

I think that's a nice one to send in . . . make sure you look them over very well. Spend some time with the book, look at every page . . . read it even - it'll be your last chance

 

9.0 if the BC is as nice

 

didn't notice the 2 spine bends last night . . .

[-cryptkeeper-]

without bc 9.2

[ronm3-migration]

The centering is amazing on this book as well as nice and white. The only problem I see is in the lower right corner on the front. Now I am expecting the back to be as nice so i say you defintely have a 9.2.

[divad]

What about the spine bend next to Spidey's head?

[joeypost]

I agree with divad, the bottom right corner, the indent/crease halfway down the spine and a small impact ding under the P in Spider on FC are what jump out at me right away, I cannot tell from the scan if there are any other small creases on the spine both FC and BC. If there are additional creases then 9.0 is the best I would expect this book to get.

 

p.s. here is a little test I do that helps when I am considering sending in books bronze age and older into CGC. I have (or had) a high resolution scanner and Microsoft photo editor. Photo editor allows you to make negatives of your scans. Many creases and defects show up much better on the negative than they do in a regular scan or to the naked eye