Avengers #99 Barry Smith Art

[divad]

 

 

[KingOfRulers]

9.2

[marvelcollector]

9.2-9.4..ULFC is only concern regarding the higher grade...

[blutobc]

Solid 9.2

 

One of my fav Avenger books.

[MCMiles]

9.0 Lower left corner has a minor issue also. Also an impact on lower right edge. This also looks like one of those comics that has a lack of appeal because it is dirty or something. Lack of cover gloss?

[divad]

9.0 Lower left corner has a minor issue also. Also an impact on lower right edge. This also looks like one of those comics that has a lack of appeal because it is dirty or something. Lack of cover gloss?

 

[blutobc]

9.0 Lower left corner has a minor issue also. Also an impact on lower right edge. This also looks like one of those comics that has a lack of appeal because it is dirty or something. Lack of cover gloss?

 

Not an expert opinion but every copy of this issue that I have seen, has that flat look. Possibly due to the black background.

[mar-vell]

9.2/9.4 - lean towards 9.2 because LLFC has slight blunting and it is the type that typically acompanies slight splitting/tearing of the spine - is there a very small plit there? say 1/16 to 1/32 of an inch?

[divad]

9.2/9.4 - lean towards 9.2 because LLFC has slight blunting and it is the type that typically acompanies slight splitting/tearing of the spine - is there a very small plit there? say 1/16 to 1/32 of an inch?

 

There's the tiniest of nibs, less than 1/32", too small to even call a bindery chip.

 

You guys need to step back a little towards reality . . .

[Point Five]

4.0 to 4.5...leaning towards 4.0 because of that giant chunk of missing cover at the bottom of the spine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kidding.

[divad]

4.0 to 4.5...leaning towards 4.0 because of that giant chunk of missing cover at the bottom of the spine.

 

Kidding.

 

[Comicdey]

9.0 Lower left corner has a minor issue also. Also an impact on lower right edge. This also looks like one of those comics that has a lack of appeal because it is dirty or something. Lack of cover gloss?

 

 

Check out my recent grade my Avengers 98......flat, not glossy?

 

 

Not an expert opinion but every copy of this issue that I have seen, has that flat look. Possibly due to the black background.

 

Divad,

 

Nice book 9.2

[mar-vell]

9.2/9.4 - lean towards 9.2 because LLFC has slight blunting and it is the type that typically acompanies slight splitting/tearing of the spine - is there a very small plit there? say 1/16 to 1/32 of an inch?

 

There's the tiniest of nibs, less than 1/32", too small to even call a bindery chip.

 

You guys need to step back a little towards reality . . .

 

i couldn't wait to hear the comment --i knew there would be one--but hey i was right wasn't I?

c'mon i was jus playin'-- beautiful book!

[joeypost]

9.0 to 9.2. I would not be surprised with it coming back either grade if sent in to CGC. Personally I am leaning towards the 9.0 grade.

[-cryptkeeper-]

9.2

[Comicdey]

9.0 Lower left corner has a minor issue also. Also an impact on lower right edge. This also looks like one of those comics that has a lack of appeal because it is dirty or something. Lack of cover gloss?

 

 

Check out my recent grade my Avengers 98......flat, not glossy?

 

 

Not an expert opinion but every copy of this issue that I have seen, has that flat look. Possibly due to the black background.

 

Divad,

 

Nice book 9.2

 

I've changed my mind......doctored scans(too many pixels) and non production related defects bring this down to a 4.0. Aren't all pre 1975 books in VG condition on average anyway.