tonytiger

Does anyone know what page rate Baker was paid? and for covers?

Unreal archie collection!!! Mighty impressive!!!

FF#50 9.8 $44,000 Eeeek.

Sold at a CC auction about a year and a half ago. Something like $65,000

What is the CGC 7.0 worth that was sold last year?

201k

Someone took a whiz. was a ring of thieves last year at NYCC So how much you quietly pay the thief?

So how did a Whiz #1 get stolen??

Very Impressive.

What a great cover!!!!

"Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City sailor wana hump hump bar or is this getaway day, and your last shot at his whiskey. Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here."

Wow, very very cool. Great group of some great covers. Wonderful

Read it on Scoop.

Saw that an Avengers #1 9.6 sold for $250,000

The difference is that Lichtenstein was marketed to wealthy collectors where as comic book artists were marketed to kids.

Went to a garage sale a few year ago in Maine. Found a pretty nice Hulk 181 for $50. Sold it on ebay the next week for 400.

What Marvel needs is a G.A. Human Torch/G.A. Subbie movie that culminates with a battle ala Marvel 9.

100k is a killer sale for a killer book.

The book in the article is the 8.0 Kansas copy. So that is not Cage's copy.

Not sure which book that is. I do not believe that this is Cage's copy.

L.B. Cole estate auction is ending soon. Never really paid much attention to Cole books before. Having said that, those covers sure are pretty. What happened to all the LB Cole Star original art?

brutal

That's a lot of covers. Was it something about the printing of this book that lends itself to having double covers? What about #88? #89?

And you actually saying this is the same thing? No one is disputing that a high-grade copy of NM 98 has some value and that Deadpool is popular character. What is so incredibly humorous is that someone is willing to pay such a huge premium for a totally arbitrary 1/10 of a CGC grade difference. It's interesting isn't it that we choose to use information in whatever way suits our purpose. Because another way to look at it is that, if in fact what you are saying is true, that it is "totally arbitary", then there would not be only 1 9.9 and 396 9.8s. If it was "totally arbitrary", then statistically there should be many 9.9s as well as many 9.8s. A single 9.9 versus 396 9.8s would lead one to conclude that there may be something about that book that is different from the 396 9.8s. You know. I don't think that is true.

In an auction, it sometimes takes one to tango.