1980sMoshPit

Hi. This sucks. Worked hard on building this set.  Want to show it properly.  This sucks. Anyone care ?  nope.  

Attempted a couple things again.. deleting existing CSG pic, and adding in my own pic etc.  It just still grabs the CSG pic.   

That is one funky card to get graded.  Cool ! 

HI, I got a full set relabeled and all fine with switching the photo from the old CSG to newly labeled CGC pic on 101 cards out of 102    It's just the one card that will not flip over using the Add CGC Image button. 

UFC Topps 2009 Round 1 Base set.   Cert listed below.  It's line item 61 in the set and card # 58.      Would you be able to flip the pic for me ?  

Welp. sent in my next batch for relabel    another 870 bucks added to the costs of this stuff.    Last batch came back fine so I have some faith from that aspect.  

I don't / didn't have any cards graded Perfect 10.     Wasn't that just a thing on the non sports TCG side ?   If the Perfect 10 was available for sports cards on the old CSG side.. i failed miserably at getting a single one. 

Just fyi for anyone doing the reholdering for cards from registry sets.   The new CGC pics do not automatically replace the old CSG pic in the registry.. BUT !!!  you can just click on the pic and you'll find a 'replace with CGC image'  button.   It flips it right over to the CGC image..  Now just have to do that about 500 times .. heh 

I had the same thought originally but did read somewhere, as NK stated above, the CSG Mint+ 9.5s would not go to 10. and they don't for sure     Reholdered example below.     

heh heh. 

Am giving in on the situation... but just up to this final little label fiasco. One more thing here and oh man.. I might actually bail from the hobby. 

It's gunna end up costing me about $2500 for relabeling the stuff I want relabeled.  It's a complete halt to getting my pending stuff actually graded, and now trying to sell CSG stuff I don't want, will take a bit hit. Suckness.   It's like, I ain't rich dudes.   One more shot here.    I like the history of CGC with the comics etc.  Historically very reputable there I believe.   Was never a comic book dude though.  I had to get away from PSA once a card I had graded a 7... which I cracked out and resubbed, and it got a 10.   That was that.   

and !!!!  no idea if the registry set pics will update with the new pics or not.  Still has the old CSG labelled cards.  I don't want to manually take scans of all this and change the photos.. ohh man.    

MOSH 

All back home, safe and sound. No issues.   Unfortunately now I have another set plus extras to get relabeled !!   Well...It's just a thing now, they have to be CGC.  CSG graded labels no longer cut the mustard.    If the label changes again in the next decade, I will burn all of it !!!

Didn't notice the earlier one, but would be in for the next !  

wait.. are you saying the point scoring is actually starting to make sense ?  Woo Hoo !  

heh heh, 

Sent in a 102 card registry complete set.  40 10s,   55 9.5's,  7 9's.  for relabeling from CSG to the new CGC slab.   It is my best set.  Hoping for safe crack, re-encasement, and back home delivery  !!  

Hi,  

I have a couple registry sets, each with 102 cards having the newer CSG label.  Am looking to get them re-holdered to the CGC label.    Is there a way to cheat on the submission form for this, verse entering in card by card ?   

If wanting to ensure consistency in a complete graded set, I have one with 102 cards,  40 of which are CSG 10.  I think I read somewhere it is not advisable to reholder 10s to the new CGC label.  Is this accurate ?   Possibly due to chance of harming the card during re-holdering ? 

thank you 

And just to be 100% on this,  I can, at this time,  send in stuff for relabeling with the new label,   correct ?   

Man, now I gotta type in all those cert numbers one by one again..  I better get to the store for a case of frosty barley pops.   

Would also support that ANY people around the last two rounds of making the decisions on labels are currently 6 feet under. heh.   Possibly those woke folks are gone now.  double heh.  Hoping this is it, and the folks now involved actually serve a purpose in this world. 

This had to be. Never understood the CGC CSG different company things.  Freakish.   This combined thing should end all the wackiness, so fully support it. Glorious. 

I got the deal going on too with the slabs, but not as far as above.  Two 102 card sets I'll get reholdered at what looks like an expense of 1100 or whatever.    OK.  

The deal with GEM MINT 9.5 becoming 10, love it.  The ONLY issue is if there is a simple visible flaw, on a card, that is in a new slab, having a Gem Mint 10 grade on it,  the hoards of freaks out there with microAiscanomatics could have a field day attacking things and come up with the CGC = GEM MINT grading thing.  They will. heh.     Soooo,   the CSG 9.5 Gem Mints out there had better be gooooood

Love it though.  Final it is hopefully.   That CSG CGC freakish separated thing was more freakish than anything ever as freakish before thee in card grading.   I think it's now unfreakied. 

I durability tested your post.   It failed.    What ? 

On 5/7/2022 at 12:12 AM, BSJ3434 said:

So what does that mean for this card. I had a minimum of 60/40 or I couldn’t get an 8. Obviously the rest of it is Gem Mint. So why would it cross over to the new label as just an 8 if all of the centering criteria has been revised?

heh

This is pretty cool.  :) 

I figured out how to actually 'request a score correction'.      If you got a Zero points thing for a newly added card, click on the Zero and it will take you to the below.    Kinda works in the way when a card is matching a registry and you have to hit the request for review button.    I submitted the request for the card below some day last week, but it's not updated as of yet.. As least it's in some queue to get from a zero points on a 10 card :) 

Glorious ! 

Hi,  

For this set in the registry   UFC Topps 2009 Round 1 Blue Auto    there is one auto card that was never issued.   As per the Trading Card Database (and known across the UFC collecting community)   Auto card    A-RH Roger Huerta, which is line item 31 in the Registry set does not exist, and it was replaced by Topps with a redemption auto card of A-RF Rich Franklin which is already on the registry set in slot 29.   

https://www.tcdb.com/Inserts.cfm/sid/57906/2009-Topps-UFC-Round-1  states the below: 

Insertion odds: Cards ABV, ACG, ACK, ACL, ADS, AEH, AGG, AHH, AKF, AKP, AMB, AMG, ARF*, ARH, ATA, ATS, ARCL: 1:15 packs; Cards ABS, AJB, AMR, ATC, AWG, ACBD, ASST: 1:20 packs; Cards AMS, : 1:70 packs; Cards ABB, AHD, ARG, ARL: 1:72 packs; Cards APK, AMDA: 1:94 packs; Cards AAS, AQJ, ARC, AGSP: 1:118 packs; Cards AFG, ABJP: 1:188 packs. *Card ARF is SN440 and was provided as the redemption for exchange card ARH (Robert Huerta) which was never issued. The stated odds are for the ARH exchange card.

Although the A-RH Roger Huerta card is seen in some online checklists,  the card was not ever issued.     

Does this make sense enough to remove the A-RH Roger Huerta  card from the UFC Topps 2009 Round 1 Blue Auto   registry set ?  

just popped box arrived !! woo hoo !!!!!   Love it when a box shows up.  It's fun !   

My CSG 9.5 2009 Topps UFC round 1 # 91 Herb Dean card showed as 204 points before.   Replaced it in the registry with a 10 just now,    and the points went to zero.  Actual '0'    heh  WOO HOO ! :) 

Normally there is the greatness of the Front/Back card Image being auto added when I had a card to a registry set.  Added 5 cards yesterday to a specific set and the images did not populate.   

Too funny..   O/C cards are preferred in TCG land ?   wow.  That's like a mind freak.. rooting for O/C cards when busting stuff.