• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Hero Restoration

Member
  • Posts

    2,089
  • Joined

Posts posted by Hero Restoration

  1. Hi all, I have read this topic several times, looked up availablity of all the scanners mentioned and also looking for the most affordable scanner that seemed to get some of the best results. I ended up buying a Scanjet proffesional 8300 for $92 including shipping off of eBay. Here is a test scan using stock setting at 300 DPI, no enhancements. I am using it on Windows 7 but is also suppose to be compatible with Vista and XP.

     

    scan0001.jpg

  2. I was doing a search on Primer looking for an old post of mine and didn't realize there was a thread dedicated to primer so I thought I would post this #2.

    I think it was cool that I saved this book from not being desired using a standard pressing technique.

     

    PRba1-1.jpg

     

     

     

    PRba2-1.jpg

     

     

     

    PRba3-1.jpg

  3. DSC03870.jpg

     

    In the interest of full disclosure this book has been pressed and here is some before and after photos showing the main defects that pressed out.

     

    ba1-5.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ba3-4.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ba6.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ba5.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ba4-2.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ba2-6.jpg

  4. :gossip: Replaced staples get's a PLOD from CGC as well.
    Incorrect. For books in the grade range of 6.0 and lower it will still get a blue label provided the staples are vintage and that is the only thing done. In grades higher than 6.0 it will receive a qualified grade.
    I had a MS 5 9.0 with a purble label (shrug)

     

    Maybe it had other work done on it? Or maybe that was an older submission as CGC changes how they treat certain things over time. I have seen replaced staples in both blue and green and can't make heads or tales of it. I think most people would consider it restoration and therfore value it less than if it had the original staples but not by much. Replaced staples is still better than say a married cover which gets a green label as well as long as thats all that was done to it. I myself would never recommend replacing the staples unless the book was getting restoration/conservation anyways but I think it was a more popular thing to do back in the 60's as was tape, extra staples and leaving the staples out all together to avoid rust and wear on the staple areas.

  5. Thanks, all. And thanks, telerites, for another good example.

     

    I purposely avoided including personal opinions in my lead-off post. However, at this point, I’d like to say that I was quite surprised by many of the things I saw. Here are some examples of Blue Label books with a detached centerfold (the Aquaman #46), a blown staple, or a completely detached cover:

     

    th_B2-1.jpg th_B2-2.jpg th_B2-3.jpg th_B2-4.jpg

    th_B2-5.jpg th_B2-6.jpg th_B2-7.jpg th_B2-8.jpg th_B2-9.jpg th_B2-10.jpg

     

    According to these examples, a pristine book with a detached centerfold can receive a Universal Grade as high as 9.4, a lightly worn book with a blown staple can grade as high as 9.0 to 9.4, and a book with a completely detached cover can grade as high as 4.0. WTF? In my world, a book that's essentially flawless aside from a blown staple has always been a FN/VF. No wonder I have so many repeat buyers!

     

    doh!

     

     

    The Superman #172 and Aquaman #46 books above should be a QUALIFIED 9.2 and 9.4, respectively.

     

    The key visual being that the defects on the label are described in ALL CAPS, which is only for Qualified defects.

     

    I have seen other books where the label color was wrong but the census had it correct. From the Superman 172, though, the label is blue and the census lookup shows that in fact it was graded as universal.

     

    SU172.jpg

     

    So then it is a mistake on the label and the census? Surely no book could grade a 9.2 with a cover detached at one staple, right?