Funnyslover

Yesterday I asked the seller, via eBay, : "Are these original LIM pencils ?" and the reply has come back : "Hi, Yes, they are. I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any other questions/concerns" Unambiguous and somehow genuine sounding ?

This has got to be one of the most interesting threads of recent times. I was buying off the spinner racks at age 12 in 1965 and my favorites are Kirby, Ditko and Sekowsky. I was one of the few in my group who collected both D.C. and Marvel. As a lover and collector of Sekowsky/Sachs JLA OA, I was particularly struck by vodou's observation that : "Collectors of all eras have their nostalgic touchstones to which they are aesthetically blind...generally the rest of us don't call that deficiency out, out of kindness, and especially on the The OFFICIAL "This Week..." thread. And, of course, we all suffer terribly that same deficiency to a greater or lesser extent ;\)" G'nite

The cover to JLA 21 Bechara - willing to trade ? G'nite

Go to : http://boards.collectors-society.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=9560404&fpart=1 and from page 1 go to the very first link wherein the 3rd & 4th images contain Irene Vartanoff's list. G'nite

It reminds me of Chitty Chitty bang bang : Hide your kirbys Hide your kirbys The disney is coming G'nite

The guy has been punished for his crimes. The links have been (re)published. Enough with this enjoyment and heightening of his pain.

Well said.

You might also want to refer them to Condition 9 (3rd sentence) below which provides an alternative wording : http://www.comiclink.com/TermsConditionsBuying.asp G'nite

Yes Clink use the combination of "not" and "good faith" twice in the same set of terms. So theirs is certainly correct. See Condition 9 at this link : http://www.comiclink.com/TermsConditionsBuying.asp Early nite. G'nite

G'nite xx

It's rumored that the front runners are Mike B, Jim H and Peter K.

Assuming auction houses' rules legitimising bids by consignors and their agents will continue, I think we should lobby the auction houses asking that they highlight bids made by consignors (and their nominated agents) - both on screen and on the floor.

Isn't that the point however, to divert attention from the original discussion? Which one was the original discussion . . . I'm losing track? Strictly speaking, that honour may now belong to the " X-Men 2 splash" thread. That said, certainly the most amusing to date is the long running FRIENDS OF HERITAGE SPEAK UP

There's absolutely no doubt about condition 15 http://www.ha.com/c/ref/terms-and-conditions.zx?view=terms It's what we sign up to when we bid. I'm inclined to think that there must surely be a good reason for such a publicly visible and transparent condition.

At last ! G'nite xxx

Well next time they bring it up refer them to condition 15 of their own document ( http://www.ha.com/c/ref/terms-and-conditions.zx?view=terms ) and ask them if they intend amending the written words to synchronize better with the spoken.

At last ! G'nite xxx

Before going to sleep read condition 15 again at http://www.ha.com/c/ref/terms-and-conditions.zx?view=terms G'nite xxx

Nothing there says what he did wasn't immoral. Nothing said there doesn't disprove his line of being "one of the most honest and trusted sellers" as now false. All it tells me, is that HA is as corrupt and immoral as Mike has shown himself to be in this. So, HA and Mike are both to not longer be trusted. Nothing more. Indeed. Don't let the facts get in the way. G'nite xxx

see 15 http://www.ha.com/c/ref/terms-and-conditions.zx?view=terms

It's of academic interest but irrelevant really. The guy or gal made a mistake. Condition 15 is what matters http://www.ha.com/c/ref/terms-and-conditions.zx?view=terms

But condition number 15 of their general Terms and Conditions proves that statement wrong : http://www.ha.com/c/ref/terms-and-conditions.zx?view=terms

Read condition number 15 : http://www.ha.com/c/ref/terms-and-conditions.zx?view=terms G'nite xxx

Aka Shutting out inconvenient facts. Go read the T&A

The T&A simply declare that the seller or his agents can bid. Should one choose to bid one effectively agrees to these terms. The assumption is that you read the T&A - (seriously not been rude) - something that clearly 999 out of 1000 do not do. Sad really.