fett

a few more

Best reds I've ever seen on that cover. Plus it's a cover where he worked his name into the scene.

wow that's a sharp copy! Back atcha

(I've always wondered if James Hetfield ever saw this last cover when he was a kid. )

Charlton published quite an array of books

picked this up recently, first time I'd seen a copy for sale

Many thanks for posting all these great books guys. They sure are different. The more I see of this publisher the more I like.

from Strange Tales #181 would love to have the OA for that last page.

all of the bronze movie speculation reminds me of this part of this story..

A key? First appearance of the White Tiger? Or is every 70s comic considered a key now? Great Larkin cover though.

looking through completed orders and noticed this auction. Great Iron Fist cover but is it really that hard to find this in good condition? This individual issue has a few problems especially for that high a price. http://www.ebay.com/itm/131535571839?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

taken from a photo cover from Fawcett, Life Story #18

a couple more Charltons with a Fox hangover..only one a romance from Murder Incorporated #14 (Fox) from My Secret Life #24 (Fox)

one of the quirky things I've noticed about Charlton (especially mid-to-late 50s romance) is how much they like to use interior splashes from one title as the cover to another title. Noticed this today though going through a Sweethearts from 1954... the Charlton in question the interior splash then a few years later, but at St. John First time I had seen this. Wonder how the art moved around?

I have no skin in this game, but I find it strange that a " 2nd appearance" is missing from this list. When you look at it listed the way it is above, one gets a better idea of how absurd the whole argument is. Its like everyone is trying as hard as they can to not call 181 his 2nd appearance, and go as far as eliminating a 2nd appearance entirely. If 182 is his 3rd appearance, what is his 2nd? Anyone? Then you have to ask.... If 182 is a cameo ( and it is ), why is it considered his 3rd appearance? Based on your standards above, should it not be considered his 3rd appearance ( cameo ) and Giant size x-men be his 3rd full? This is what you are doing for his first appearance above, but change your stance on later appearances ... again ... why is there a double standard in place? I personally think we should consider labeling books ( with 1st cameos ) from now on like this: 180 : 1st appearance of wolverine ( cameo ) 181: 2nd appearance of Wolverine ( 1st full appearance ) 182: 3rd appearance of Wolverine ( cameo ) Giant size X-men 1: 4th appearance of Wolverine ( 2nd full appearance) Uncanny X-men 94 : 5th appearance of Wolverine ( 3rd full appearance) To me, this explains his appearances properly. Cameo has been a term we have used in this hobby forever. It doesn't need to go away, just call them for what they are. They are appearances, period. Cameo or not, label them in order and call them what they are. It doesn't matter if a characters 4th appearance is his 1st full, its still his 4th appearance ( 1st full) (thumbs u ...I approach this in an unorthodox manner, but agree with you for the most part. In my opinion, if you don't own 180, 181, AND 182 then you don't own Wolverines first appearance. It's all the SAME story. GOD BLESS... -jimbo(a friend of jesus) (thumbs u I like the 3-in-one story approach also. #180 is the first page, #181 is the meat of the story (money issue), and #182 is the last page. Each individual can call the first two parts of the story whatever they want.

any of these beer logos have a hologram or a limited edition collectors embossed card with it?

late 40s Standard

lately picking up a few of these late 1940s Standards full scan of this ish at DCM http://digitalcomicmuseum.com/index.php?dlid=25559 others...

my most fervent wish for this movie is for the panther to be called Panther Devil at some point .

http://digitalcomicmuseum.com/index.php?dlid=20222 scanned at DCM

do you own this? my kneejerk reaction would be that someone photoshopped somewhere or inserted the lowgrade copy into a different container.