• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

DiamondCityComics

Member
  • Posts

    794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DiamondCityComics

  1. 55 minutes ago, drotto said:

    My honest short non spoiler reaction.  Good to great but not mind blowing.  I tentatively have it as my 7th favorite MCU movie, but that could change. Way more sentimental and character driven then I expected, and felt very much like the end. About a 7 or maybe 8 out of 10.

     

    For the MCU as a whole it works very well.  I do wonder if Disney has inadvertently created a jumping off point for many especially the more casual fans.

    I was thinking the same thing about the casual viewers being less likely to continue watching all of these because of how this movie went.

  2. 28 minutes ago, Bird said:

    I don’t have much interest in seeing the joker as a sympathetic characterWhich is where they seem to be going with this origin story I think he works best as a crazy psycho pathic character not as someone you feel sympathy for or understand 

    My recommendation is dont watch it.  Thanks for your take though it was very interesting!!

  3. 17 minutes ago, chrisco37 said:

    Saw CM earlier today.  I thought it was good, but not great.  Better than Ant-Man but not as good as Dr. Strange, both movies are rewatches for me.  It was a little jumpy at parts and would’ve benefited from better directing.  Brie Larson was fine although scenes where she was running, it looked like she was really slow.  Skrulls were good.  Stan Lee tribute at the beginning was a nice moment.  

    My 11-yr old daughter loved it.  It’s a hit already.  

    You must be 40ish and whiteish!!!  Your opinion is not welcome here.

  4. Saw it with my wife tonight.  Before I gave my opinion I wanted to see what she thought of it right after it finished and she said it was ok but not even close to being as good as a bunch of other comic movies.  She could care less about the studios as we watch all the comic movies.  I personally thought it was just ok as well .  Definitely didn't blow me away. There's something about Larsons acting that just didn't do it for me.  Still recommend seeing it as a lead in to the next movies.

     

  5. 7 minutes ago, Jaydogrules said:

    Point taken.

    To which my response is:  All of the purported subsidies/grants in the world don't change its big dumb all in budget of $350MM.  Warner managed to dodge a bullet (again).  This will take some of the sting out of the Justice League debacle, and its even bigger, dumber budget.  Good for WB.

    Here's to hoping they make smarter, better movies going forward, which will allow them to reap better rewards and hopefully lead to even more, better movies.

    -J.

    Why does it  seem the only movie anyone adds the marketing budget on to the production budget is Aquaman?

  6. 11 minutes ago, NewEnglandGothic said:

    I heard some bloke called Christopher Nolan, was going to try to make some Batman movies to hit that goal first (DISCLAIMER, so joke isn't spun back against me: in unadjusted USD dollars.)

    Didn't the Dark Knight and Rises hit 1B worldwide?

  7. 1 hour ago, Gatsby77 said:

    Worth noting that in less than two weeks of domestic release, Aquaman's stats look near-comparable to Venom's full run:

    Aquaman

    $222.8M domestic / $623.5M international 

    26.3% domestic / 73.7% international split

    $846.3M total

    Venom

    $213.3M domestic / $642.1M international

    24.9% domestic / 75.1% international split

    $855.5M total

     

    I still think $300M domestic is a stretch for Aquaman, but hopefully its success will convince WB to actually schedule a Flash solo movie.

    Yes but Aquaman needs to make over 500 billion to make a profit!!!!!