BB #54 was not intended to be the 1st TT but in hindsight it ended up being the 1st TT after they appeared in a 2nd issue in #60.
Roy, I hate to disagree with you, but the creators have said that the editorial directive that led to BB 54 was to do a "Junior Justice League" adventure. DC had, in fact, suggested in the letters column of BB years before that a JJLA adventure would be forthcoming in response to fan demand. Haney's recollection is that it was Kashdan who made the directive. Haney said in 1996:
"I think it was George Kashdan who first said: 'How about a series starring the kid superheroes?' and that later I was the one who came up with the name Teen Titans. ... It was no great earth shaking creative stroke, taking some already existing house characters and combining them into a team...."
Right, I meant that it was not the 1st TT in name as the name had not yet been created.
Most of the opposition to BB #54 being the 1st TT seems to stem from the name not yet being announced as the TT in BB #54.
The editorial intent was there, the characters were there, the team up was there - the only thing missing was the name.
And then BB #60 ran on the coat tails of #54's success and a name was given to a team which had already been formulated 7 issues prior.
I think we're in agreement in theory. I just worded it poorly.
And it only took 91 pages.