What about those handful of board members that have been registered for like 4 years but barely post?
My old saltwater fish forum had a minimum 90 day AND 90 meaningful( no "nice tanks" or "SWEET!" posts counted) posts requirement before you could even view the buying/selling forum. A lot of people whined and moaned that they had been there for years but just lurk and dont post. Admins response was basically "this is a community and if you want the benefits of buying/selling to the community, you have to participate in some meaningful way. Just reading posts for years doesnt entitle you to these benefits".
A lot of people were upset but it DEFINITELY helped cut down on the buying/selling problems.
How could you possibly monitor "meaningful" posts and who is going to count them up before they reach the invisible line?
Oh, the mods over there were WAY different from here! They had no problem whatsoever going thru the forums and adjusting peoples post counts that they thought were just padding them with "nice tank" posts. Happened all day every day.
Okay, but that's that board and this is this board. While minimum post counts are a good idea conceptually, it's not practical to monitor and having a blanket policy that is easy to circumvent or harms longtime members doesn't really serve its intended purpose. Maybe there should be a "real" feedback forum. The one we have now, which only allows for positive comments, is useless. I never direct people to my feedback thread because it's pointless if all you can say is, "A+! Smooth transaction!" I'm not even sure how effective altering the feedback thread would be either.
The 30 day wait period for Miamiknight's issue seems unnecessary. Nothing will change in 30 days. The seller backed out of a deal. Case closed. To the PL!