In a word. No.
-J.
I agree. a few years down the line..if she's still relevant, then I'd say they might consider it. But movies are a very very large financial risk, so they tend to prefer established franchises that have demonstrated they have staying power.
Not a dig on the character, just my thoughts.
Sure. Huge risk. With a character blowing up, hundred of thousands of fans within little more than 6 months, cos players, millions of dollars spent on properties - an investment of a 100 mil on a failed comic line from the 90s is more promising
Sony just killed Gwen in the last movie. That'd be a tough one to explain away if they wanted to bring in S-G. Maybe they use a different actress, which would further confuse the average moviegoer. I'm also not clear who would own the movie rights, as I thought Sony had the rights to any Spider-man character or villain, and Gwen is clearly in that universe. S-G the character has to be too recent to count (we already know Marvel wouldn't innovate just to give ideas away), but if she's based on Gwen Stacy you're going through Sony. Silk would be the clearer choice to bring in a female, but, again, not sure Sony could use a recent creation.
When did it ever stop Hollywood to make movies based on hype alone?
This is (for the most pasrt) a teenage comic based character - if Spider-Gwen showed up for 90 minutes swinging from buildings, slugging bad guys and banging on her drums - thats all the fans would care for.
I don't know why its hard for people to come to grips with her success???