cloud cloddie

It was hard to wade through the posts to see it, but some people wanted actual pm/screen caps and such from you since you're the main nominator. If you could provide those, it would make his nomination a lot easier

This. The board did make a decision, and he should be added to the HOS. If changes need to be made to the process or to the HOS/PL in general, great. But that's a separate issue.

Well, on the PL until he makes a behind the scenes deal to get off of it. Something, no one seems to want to acknowledge can very easily happen. For real. 4comix already stated he knew he was shady and dealt with him anyway. What's to stop hustrucker from sending him a perk to get off the PL?

The shilling was not proven, not admitted to. One thing that rubs my rhubarb is when people say "I am fairly positive" or similar (like "I think" or "I am pretty sure" etc. Would you like to be accused and convicted of something because another person was "fairly positive" or "thought" or was "pretty sure" you did something? I have seen this kind of "testimony" many times here, and more often than not it turns out to be either false or about someone else. This is why substantiated evidence as in posts, PMs etc. are asked for. Haha. Sure. Because judging by this thread, I'd only be accused and never convicted. So you are saying you should be put on the list by someone saying they "are pretty sure" or "thought" or were "fairly positive" you did something? Are you even familiar with the process? I wouldn't be put on the list, because I've done nothing that could even be perceived as PL or HOS worthy. The hustruck discussion has been going on for a while. Besides from a few objections, I didn't see a big uproar before the poll started. Now, days and an overwhelming yes vote later, everybody voting yes is suddenly a mob and the doubts are more vocal. And now the new mob has won. We're not going to agree on this, and he's still on the PL list, so to me it's becoming a moot point. Put him on, don't put him on. I just think there's enough shady business on his part to merit more than PL

The shilling was not proven, not admitted to. One thing that rubs my rhubarb is when people say "I am fairly positive" or similar (like "I think" or "I am pretty sure" etc. Would you like to be accused and convicted of something because another person was "fairly positive" or "thought" or was "pretty sure" you did something? I have seen this kind of "testimony" many times here, and more often than not it turns out to be either false or about someone else. This is why substantiated evidence as in posts, PMs etc. are asked for. Haha. Sure. Because judging by this thread, I'd only be accused and never convicted.

The shilling has been proven. I don't have the patience to go through the 20,000 posts in this thread to find his posts, but I'm fairly positive he admitted to it when called on it last year, claiming ignorance. Then immediately did it again. Somebody with more of a stake is more than welcome to verify this. I wouldn't deal with him regardless of inclusion in the HOS (even tho I think he's deserving of it) Symbiotic was the one who admitted it He was one of the shillers, but I thought there was a hustruck shill acknowledgement as well

The shilling has been proven. I don't have the patience to go through the 20,000 posts in this thread to find his posts, but I'm fairly positive he admitted to it when called on it last year, claiming ignorance. Then immediately did it again. Somebody with more of a stake is more than welcome to verify this. I wouldn't deal with him regardless of inclusion in the HOS (even tho I think he's deserving of it)

No. I understand the points against his nomination. But enough people think he deserves to be on the HOS list, for actual offenses. Please outline the actual offenses that violate the PL/HOS. You helped refine the offenses yourself. We just view the severity of them differently.

No. I understand the points against his nomination. But enough people think he deserves to be on the HOS list, for actual offenses.

They're showing Blade Runner on the big screen near me, so stoked to go see it today

I would think that if you were a CGC SS facilitator, and you lost someone's key golden age book, you would be on the probation list until you replaced it.

Planet of the apes 3 and Fantastic Four 2 release dates moved. https://games.yahoo.com/news/next-planet-apes-film-sequel-163500704.html

And it begins... http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=gambit+9.8&_from=R40&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR4.TRC1.A0.H0.Xx-men+266+9.8&_nkw=x-men+266+9.8&_sacat=0

Hustruck007 is now showing as an invalid user id now when I try to add it to my ebay block list all lowercase - hustruck007 eBay is case sensitive. Done. (thumbs u

Hustruck007 is now showing as an invalid user id now when I try to add it to my ebay block list

I agree that there are actresses better suited for the role. But at least with a name like ScarJo's attached, it'll get a realistic budget - and hopefully not be a complete ratchet mess. I'd rather have the option of loving it or hating it when it comes out than no option at all.

No release date set that I can see, but I'm not upset by this information... New Action Star Scarlett Johansson Signs On to 'Ghost in the Shell'

Phrasing.

haha. beat me to it

ducks superman, joker, captain America, kraven, dr doom, thor, spiderman

The comments on that review page are hilarious. It reads like when I venture into the water cooler

Um, yeah. It's f'n awesome.

Yeah, I never understood the hate thrown towards MOS. I liked it, and it's the only DC movie I own.