• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

PIR8

Member
  • Posts

    1,825
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PIR8

  1. Not speaking one way or another on what happened, no desire to speculate on that. But no prior history wouldn't eliminate the possibility of domestic abuse.
  2. Yeah it's no BS, it came straight from Kurtis http://kurtiswiebe.com/2014/11/21/my-statement-on-the-rat-queens-news/ Yea, on my mobile I didn't realize it was actually his web page I had been linked to. I'm bummed about the whole situation.
  3. Roc will no longer be illustrating Rat Queens. I'm at work, so I can't link the article, I'm sure someone can find it, but if not I'll link it when I get home from work. Edit: Also, didn't have time to fact check the article, so if its BS, apologies. Edit: Kurtis Wiebe's comments
  4. I think so. Pre screen tends to hold them up a bit.
  5. Great stuff Bob!! I spend more time than I care to admit admiring your Manifest Destiny OA on CAF.
  6. neither of them is her first appearance. MSH13 is her first appearance, and CM1 is the book where she becomes Captain Marvel. hence, "cant see the forest for the trees" comment that started all this. But the first time the audience see's her as Captain Marvel is AS #9. As long as there is precedence for an ad being labeled a "first appearance/first appearance as..." I would think the CGC labels would be. Captain Marvel #1 - Carol Danvers becomes Captain Marvel Avenging Spider-man #9 - First appearance of Carol Danvers as Captain Marvel
  7. But if AS#9 was released first, would that not be her first appearance as Captain Marvel? No dog in this fight, just curious. The release schedule for the corresponding series can't change their content. The first appearance of Captain Marvel, (you cant really call a name change a first appearance, but that's another debate), is the Panel I posted. (thumbs u Gotchya Was a little confused by the argument (only skimmed). I thought there was some debate as to whether or not she was Captain Marvel in AS#9. I would have to come down on the AS#9 side then. In a canonical sense, yes Captain Marvel #1 was first, but the first comic book that collectors could purchase that featured her as Captain Marvel would be AS#9. I suppose it would come down to if you believed "First Appearance" means "first appearance in a comic book" or "first chronological appearance."
  8. But if AS#9 was released first, would that not be her first appearance as Captain Marvel? No dog in this fight, just curious.
  9. I didn't know the registry was up for this one I'll enjoy my (however brief) period at the top.
  10. Never did post the set together. Have to brag somewhere.