• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Foley

Member
  • Posts

    2,814
  • Joined

Posts posted by Foley

  1. 6 minutes ago, VintageComics said:

    You're assuming someone turns in the original certificate.

    I was talking about recognizing a stolen book from memory.

    So I agree it is possible if they have a way of tracking something like this internally but not likely.

    Yeah, I thought that's what the OP was requesting.

    We're on the same page regarding the book being resubmitted without the original cert, that would be a Sisyphean task indeed.  

  2. 10 minutes ago, VintageComics said:

    There's just no possible way they could try to 'keep and eye out' for one book.

    Will they do it? No. But I wouldn't agree there's "no possible way they could" if they really wanted to. 

    I could be wrong, but I'm assuming when a book is reholdered they would input the cert number somewhere? I'm sure the number could be flagged on their system if they wanted.

    Again, I'm not saying it would be practical for them to do this with all the requests they would receive, only that it's probably not impossible like you claim.

  3. 1 hour ago, mattn792 said:

     

    How dare the two of you be so unwoke!  I'm going to Twitter and Instagram and the UN and the post office to express my outrage immediately!  People will care that I have absolutely nothing productive to say!!!!!  :bigsmile:

    Make sue to throw in some outrage over that despicably sexist exercise bike commercial while you're at it!

  4. 2 minutes ago, eastcoaster said:

    Weird for there to be no observable consistent meaning for a grade. 10 spine ticks is a 9.8. Zero spine ticks is a 9.8. Dog chewed is a 9.8. It's my secret and no one can say what a 9.8 is!

    No, this is just plain wrong. You're (incorrectly) basing this off the fact that one book in a 9.8 holder has multiple color breaking spine ticks. 99.9% of 9.8s don't.

    5 minutes ago, eastcoaster said:

    I thought grading used written criteria to compare against. So if my meaning for a 9.8 means 1 allowed small spine tick, I would be in error if I graded a comic with 20 spine ticks a 9.8. Seems pretty sensible to me. Only if I declared 20 spine ticks still qualified as 9.8 would this make sense.

    No one is saying there is no criteria for CGC's grading, only that it isn't public information.