• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

delekkerste

Member
  • Posts

    33,211
  • Joined

Posts posted by delekkerste

  1. On 4/13/2024 at 7:00 PM, Captain ShipWreck said:

    I know the card and am familiar with both versions. A lot of the roughs looked different from the finished versions. Here's a better scan of what I posted before. It could be something different but it is marked as card 11 and aliens are killing humans with guns.

    11_marsattacksport_wood.jpg

    It's probably this. It says "Preliminary" and "ink and wash over graphite" with no mention of gouache, watercolor, etc. 

  2. On 4/11/2024 at 3:15 AM, tth2 said:

    Here's a mindboggling factoid:  the loss that the seller of the 9.8 TOS 39 took in this auction would by itself almost cover the new sale price of the 9.8 TOS 39 and the TOS 39 OA page.  

    Here's another mindboggling factoid: the reported $2 million sale of the 9.8 TOS #39 was to a middleman, not the consignor. The middleman almost surely flipped it to the consignor for even more. :whatthe: 

    Also, the 9.8 was a 9.4 that was somehow pressed up 2 full notches after others who viewed the book as a 9.4 thought its potential had already been maximized and passed on it.

    I'd still take the book over the art every day of the week and twice on Sunday. At the end of the day, it's top census, population 1. 

  3. On 4/7/2024 at 10:39 AM, J.Sid said:

    Have to disagree with this. Take a step back and look again. Miller. Elektra. Vintage. An absolutely fantastic image. If drawn on one board it would have gone for 2x the result. Probably much more.

    Actually if this were drawn on one board the consignor probably would not have selected it to consign. It would take a 7-figure offer to pry it away.

    Just my 2c

    Nah, it's a nice cover, but I don't think the consignor goes from being OK with having only a $90K (hammer) reserve on it in this auction to needing 10x that much to sell it if it were on one board. The reality is that the other DD/Elektra covers - #168, 174, 175, 176 and 181 - are all way above this one in desirability and a lot of people would probably take the #179 (Elektra + DD mask only) over it as well. 

    If anything, the fact that the cover has increased over 5-fold in the past 13 years (8-fold from where it petered out in CLink's open auction) to $252K more likely means that no one really cares about it being on two boards anymore (or at least there are enough high rollers who don't). I know that the two-boards fact held me back in 2011; if I was going for the cover now, it definitely wouldn't. 2c 

    The consensus from those I've spoken to is that it met or outperformed expectations. Don't think I've heard anyone before now suggest that it could/should have gone even higher. That said, I get your love for the cover as I have very fond memories of it as well. But I think the market got it right this time. 

  4. On 4/6/2024 at 7:22 PM, stinkininkin said:

    Don't think anyone mentioned the Miller DD 174 page at $144k. Excellent page, and a pretty big number. With that in mind, makes me wonder if the seller is disappointed with DD 190 cover sale price, especially since it features both DD and Electra. Either way, I continue to be impressed with the strength of the Miller DD market!

    Considering the reserve was $90K hammer on the DD #190 cover, I'm pretty sure the seller is very happy!

    People may not remember, but, it was auctioned in 2011 at ComicLink and did not meet reserve, fetching only $31.5K before the bidding petered out. The consignor reached out to CLink after the auction and bought it; CLink later publicly reported the sale at $45K in the "Marketplace" section of its website. 

    I remember the sale well - it seems so trivial now, but, back in 2011, there was a lot of trepidation about the cover being on two boards, something which almost nobody cares about these days as we all know that high-quality acetate overlays and such can be easily made (heck, you could even turn these into *two* covers, LOL).

    IMO both the #174 page and the #190 cover achieved very full and fair values. 2c 

  5. On 4/5/2024 at 7:36 PM, batman_fan said:

    It was higher than I expected but a very nice splash with Palmer inks :cloud9:

    You know, prior to 5 minutes ago, I would have said that Palmer's inks made everyone's pencils look better, but, for Sienkiewicz, I think people just want that trademark scratchy, loose-but-dynamic (and, later, more experimental) style of him inking himself rather than Palmer's bold and tidy inks that worked great with practically every other penciller. 

  6. On 4/5/2024 at 5:30 PM, BCarter27 said:

    Not much love for Sienkiewicz Moon Knight? I thought this would have cracked $20k+, no? Thoughts?

    It's a nice piece, but, I think to make a bigger splash it needed to be main run Moon Knight and inked by Sienkiewicz himself. And, sure, later in the run does better than earlier in the run but I bet this would have still gotten a lot of love if it had been early in the main run and inked by Bill. 2c 

  7. On 3/9/2024 at 10:37 PM, tth2 said:

    Some decent prices on pieces I was following on Day 1 of the International auction:

    Overall, I saw very few :whatthe: results, a lot of stuff that was in-line, and a lot of stuff that felt a bit squishy. :blush:  Me and some friends picked up some nice bargains on the lower end (the piece I bought I'm told was listed much higher on a European dealer's site previously) but there was a lot of stuff in the mid-range that seemed pretty  meh to me price-wise as well. 

    Maybe the most surprising was the Herge Tintin piece which sold for $15K against a posted estimate of $30,000-$60,000. But there were plenty of other results that favored buyers over sellers I thought - IMO those two FF #27 pages went cheap ($22.5K each) given the content (even accounting for the George Roussos inks); the catalog cover painting only fetched $8.1K and the Kent Williams DD/Elektra painting only brought $10K, which seems stupidly low for a well-known piece with two very popular characters from that time period. 

    That said, I'm still expecting very strong results for the upcoming (U.S.) Signature Auction as I suspect it will draw far more buyers than this mixed bag of European and U.S. art (lacking in marquee pieces, it has to be said) did.

    image.png.19dfef761b1d376f903841e34c85b2ea.png

    image.thumb.png.52f15753584da98a90dafe076ded77f7.png