PBruce

The result of not packing the boxes tightly by CGC in both 2018 and now 2023 as well as quality control problems. A years long uncorrected issue. When you leave empty space in the shipping box the slabs move resulting in impact damage. Packing peanuts would solve a lot of the packaging problem. 25+ issues and counting. Damage in 8 of 11 boxes from CGC so far. Over $10k in fees and nearly $3k in damage combined 2018 and 2023. Don't blame USPS in 2018 and don't blame FedEx in 2023. Just a fraction of the damage from 2018 and 2023 pictured below. In addition, 10 issues are ridiculously shoved to the right edge beyond view and those are the new holders. Wrong spacer? First pic no seal at all. Fell in half when I removed the slab from the sleeve. 127 submissions pending at CGC. I should be excited to be receiving my submissions. Instead, I am walking on eggshells hoping my submissions don't arrive back destroyed.

Many were literally torn at the bottom edge from the inner wells shattering. My Madonna edge completely flipped over as pictured and chiseled the left corner. I was going to start a discussion on pressing prior to this mishap as I was preparing over 400 more issues to send in. Pressing is widely accepted in the comic biz and I understand why. That being said, I refuse to have anything pressed in my collection. It's a personal preference. In the sports card biz its called "spooning" and is highly frowned upon and nearly impossible to identify. The integrity of the cardboard is compromised and the crease reintroduced very easily. I don't see why it would be any different with a magazine or comic. Let me present a scenario. I have a valuable 9.2 (pick a book) and it is the highest and one of only two. I know the owner of the other 9.2 that exists and he had his 9.2 pressed. My 9.2 has never been pressed. I can send it in for pressing and it may come back 9.4 or 9.6. My point is, I am willing to pay a premium for a book that has never been pressed over a book of the same grade that has. Any sensible person would choose the unpressed issue of the same grade over the pressed issue (I think). I would feel comfortable if CGC added the fact that a particular issue had been pressed in the books description.

Yes. I snapped numerous photos and forwarded to CGC. There is no problem with the boxes and no indication from CGC that there is a problem with the boxes or packing material. There is a problem with the product not being able to handle the weight of the contents. The inner linings shattered and that should not happen during routine USPS shipping. It extends beyond that though. Many were not compressed in their holders. And, many of the dowels were not sealed as pictured above. A combination of poor quality materials and poor craftsmanship are where this is going. CGC Director and I are working to resolve but the physical damage to the magazines can't be undone.

What I have yet to hear is an explanation from CGC. More theories from members than me. I've been doing nothing but try to have a fair discussion with fellow collectors on this board. Calling me an unhinged whack job and stating to act rationally is not a fair analysis of my behavior in this forum. I've conducted myself professionally on both posts, contrary to numerous trolls. I've had no beef with fellow members, only CGC employees. I was honest in my original post about dropping f-bombs to give a fair and complete history of what happened and I think that shows more class than a lot of the trolls on my posts have shown. I never asked for my personality to be assassinated or to be psychoanalyzed by fellow collectors. I'm left with a destroyed collection and pending answers from CGC.

Trolls caused me to start a new thread. Look at the old thread. They started on this thread too. There is no definitive value anywhere for Playboy magazines and there are dozens of examples which have yet to have a single issue graded. Determining a value is very difficult especially for someone brand new to magazine grading even though I have a very long history of grading other collectibles. Declared value is not the problem.

Those are about the most fantastic condition you could ever dream of for shipping boxes. These two boxes were inspected by USPS at the time of delivery as I notified them that the contents I received the previous day were damaged. There is not evidence of any caving in and anyone who does mail order will agree that these boxes are in outstanding condition. USPS did a fantastic job handling the packages. Blame solely goes to CGC.

I thought about that. If that is the case why aren't others member submitting Playboys or heavy magazines experiencing the same problem? And why did the damage happen to two separate orders of mine?

It accounts for accidental damage. Different ball game here Shane. I have too much evidence suggesting foul play and have yet to receive an explanation from CGC.

Yes. The evidence clearly suggests that. The altercation during the encapsulation process, the flawless packages, and it being overseen by the Director. If there is another explanation as to how my magazines, in two separate invoices, shipped two different days, in four different perfect boxes, can be subjected to such damage, I'd like to hear it.

Yes. And I have over 25 years in mail order and over 35,000 public comments on eBay the last 19 years. Priority insured and registered. Registered goes through a different process than regular USPS packages. They are handled delicately. That's why the 4 postage boxes they shipped my 50 magazines in are in flawless condition. No explanation as to why 20+ issues and holders are damaged other than it being retaliatory actions by CGC employees for voicing my discontent during the encapsulation process. The encapsulation process, and I have the email, was personally overlooked by the Director of Operations who I spoke to shortly after the altercation with CGC employees. No damage to the shipping boxes and personally overseen by the Director and STILL 20+ issues damaged? Foul play....period.

Every troll comment made on my post proves that CGC is not a place to do business. Provoked and lied to by staff. Mocked by multiple members without provocation including so-called "seasoned veterans". A long time collection destroyed. They say I deserve it. They say its karma. I say I made a bad choice by choosing CGC to grade my collection. I should have kept them safe where they have been for 20 years. I should have kept the $1500 I paid for the service and membership.

Some "seasoned veterans" would rather troll my posts and mock my loss of several thousand dollars worth of my collection rather than offer words of substance. One thing everyone can agree on is that this is not my crowd and CGC and I are not a good match to do business. I learned this on my very first transaction with them before any f-bomb was ever dropped.

Thanks much for the link and for pointing out #5. It's the most sensible thing any member has done.

F-Bombs addressed, character assassination addressed. At least I was honest in my post and thats more than I can say about a group of individuals assassinating the character of someone they've never had beef with. Lets move on to what members think CGC should do about the several thousand dollars worth of damage done to my property that I trusted them with or is it easier and funner to focus on the character assassination?

Hopefully I will be compensated without having to go to court and CGC members and employees won't have to deal with me and my time wasting.