If you're interested in having a discussion, let's have a discussion.
If you're just going to join the ranks of the eternally offended, making snide, snarky comments because you're offended at something someone on the internet said with which you disagree, which wasn't directed at you personally, then there's no point.
As far as "jaydogrules"'s contention goes, the only reason people call ASM #300 a "classic" cover is because the book contains the first full appearance of arguably the greatest comic book villain created in the last 30 years, and they've stared at it longingly on store and convention dealer walls for decades.
No first appearance by Venom = no "classic cover."
And "jaydogrules" fails to make the very important distinction between colloquially referring to something as "classic", or "a classic", and the "official, according to Overstreet and/or CGC designation" of "Classic cover." All of those links are the former, naturally, because distinctions...we don't need no stinkin' distinctions!
I strongly suspect that "jaydogrules" doesn't actually understand the designation and its use in the comics collecting hobby.
I don't think ANYBODY disagrees that ASM #300 is "A" classic...just like ASM #298, #306, #312, #316, #325, #328...but it's not a "classic cover" the way the OPG and/or CGC refer to it.
I don't doubt that New Mutants #98 will...if it hasn't already...be called a "Classic Cover" soon enough.