• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

MicroJow

Member
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

Posts posted by MicroJow

  1. Hi there! I've got a Tales of Suspense 39 which I'd like to get graded but it has some restoration. If I have the restoration removed to get the blue label, there would be a spine split resulting in a detached cover bringing the book in at a roughly estimated 2.0. If I leave it as-is, then it would grade an estimated 5.0 conserved. Anyone out there have any advice on which way I should go? Thanks in advance for your time!

     

    - J

  2. 7 minutes ago, NewWorldOrder said:

    Before I even read this thread.

    If you bought this book in 1980's.....:news: I am sure you are doing okay even in this PLOD grade :shy:

    I'm not so much concerned about the value difference between blue and purple - at least not for myself since I wasn't getting it graded to sell it. This will get passed on to my kid eventually. Getting it graded was more about keeping it safe and preserved. But it was still a surprise to see that "Restored" alert once it got through the grading. I guess one of it's previous owners took a ballpoint to it in order to fill in some color breaking folds.

  3. I've only been sending books in to be graded for a short while now, but I've already received several disappointing returns: 3 books with the dreaded RESTORED label which I had no idea had any restoration done. Granted, I purchased these books back in the mid 1980s when I had no idea "restoration" was even a thing. I was just trying to fill holes in my collection. Here's the one that broke my heart, tho:

     

    FF5.jpg

  4. 12 minutes ago, D84 said:

    So, I take this as don't send them anything with a high dollar value. 

    If you don't send it, you won't get it graded. Just don't expect them to stick firmly to their turnaround times. In my experience (not just this situation but several over the past two years of submissions) the timing can be pretty random.

  5. 17 minutes ago, PKJ said:

    Not sure on pressing, another member posted their dates a few pages back. I have a Walkthrough in la-la land as well but delivered after yours.

    I just checked the pressing turnarounds and it's gone from 10 days to 15. Guess that explains some of the delay. Still worried about the first walkthrough which isn't in the system yet, however. Guess I'll just have to be patient. They haven't lost a book on me yet...

  6. I sent a walkthrough in on 3/27. Although it was delivered on 4/2, it hasn't shown up in my submissions yet. I sent another walkthrough in on 4/3 along with 2 standards in the same box. These three were listed as "received" on 4/12. The 2 standards immediately jumped to "scheduled for grading" while the walkthrough is sitting in "received". Granted, it's supposed to have a walkthrough level pressing but isn't that supposed to take 10 business days and then move over to same day grading?

  7. 7 minutes ago, marmat said:

    Why there is no #1? I always wondered

    Human Torch Comics took over the numbering from Red Raven Comics. There is no number on the cover of Human Torch Comics #1 and the indicia (copyright section) on the inside says it is #2. But by issue 3, they had a "3" on the cover even though the indicia has "4". By issue 6 they got everything sorted and 6-38 are all numbered correctly.

    - J

  8. Does anyone else think CGC should do away with the whole "#2 (1)" numbering on their labels and just label them as "#1", etc? I mean, I understand the reasoning behind the first few issues being labeled the way they are, but #4 (3) even has "No. 3" on the cover and once a book is slabbed no one's gong to be opening it to look at the indicia...

    Anyway. Just my personal preference. If the majority agrees, think we could convince CGC to make the change?

    - J

  9. Hi there! First time posting.

    I recently received a CGC-graded comic (and I checked the certification via the CGC website) and the book, which is from 1988, has a lot of space to slide from side to side and up & down within the holder. I know there's a holder within the holder, but shouldn't that "inside holder" hold the book firm? I mean, there's seriously about half an inch of space in there. All of my other CGC-graded books have "inside holders" without this extra space. The book was graded in September of 2017, if that info helps. Do I need to have this re-holdered? Or was there some kind of mix-up and the book was placed in the wrong inner holder? I can post photos if necessary.

    Thanks for your time!

    - Joe