• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

glendgold

Member
  • Posts

    1,332
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by glendgold

  1. 8 minutes ago, stinkininkin said:

    I had no idea Adams light-boxes his commissioned head sketches! That's fascinating. Collectors are cool with this (because it keeps up availability and prices reasonable)? Are there other artists who do this?

    I don't know about modern artists but Segar used a stencil with Popeye when answering fan requests. The stencil came up for auction a few years ago - one of our fellow collectors bought it.

  2. 17 minutes ago, aokartman said:

    iQbJ8Chq_2307181605571gpaiadd.jpg

    As published, it seems the train was removed, or was added onto the original art after publication?

    From the Jeff Gorrell CAF page.... "I've added a color image of the splash page that was actually published. It's not the same as the original art. The best I can figure is that Kirby needed to simplify the splash page; he redrew the section with all of the building damage so that Titan's arm is menacing but not hitting the buildings. The redrawn area would have been removed once the page was printer ready, leaving the original damaged buildings in the final version of the art. Apparently, someone tried to remove the white out or the overlay for those buildings. The result is fairly amateurish with some less-than-smooth inking in that area."

    David

    Ah...right. This is ringing some bells. Someone theorized that the Code didn't like the train smashing -- too scary.  Thanks for the info.

  3. My brain is a sieve. Does anyone else remember this splash coming up in an auction within the last, I dunno, 5 years, with some kind of whiteout or corrections involving the train in Titan's...paws? Are those paws?  Fins? Anyway, the train looks odd to my eye and I feel like this was discussed before.  https://comics.ha.com/itm/original-comic-art/splash-pages/jack-kirby-and-russ-heath-tales-of-suspense-28-splash-page-1-original-art-marvel-1962-/a/7236-94083.s?ic2=mytracked-lotspage-lotlinks-12202013&tab=MyTrackedLots-101116

     

  4. 1 hour ago, jjonahjameson11 said:

    As a Spidey guy who likes Romita art, I should be all over this, but I’m finding it difficult to feel excited about this cover, because:

    1. Um, it’s the Kangaroo.  Ohhhh, ahhhh, lame-o.

    2. Spidey’s back is facing the reader, a deterrent for me.

    3. It’s just a normal looking guy wanting to jump on (over?) Spidey.  No super villain costume, no death-ray or otherwise perilous contraptions to add to the frenzy and danger of the moment.  Just...YAWN 😴 

    But...but...he's wearing a vest

  5. 22 minutes ago, miraclemet said:

    2M is hyperbole. GLL/GA 76, another iconic cover of the era sold for what $400k? ASM100 sold for $400k two years ago? The market has gone up, but not that much for the iconic grail pieces. 

    The only stuff breaking the $1m mark is painted covers that have crossover appeal to the fantasy markets (that have far deeper pockets). Frazetta has topped $1m, but no one else. 

    But you forget...what if there are...

    Spoiler

    SHENANNIGANS

     

  6. I have no opinion on the value until we hear a good condition report and get better scans.

    Also I am skeptical that this will appeal outside of our community.  This isn't an X-Men or Avengers level of character. The Punisher logo is known out there, but not so much the character. And, uh, I think guys who like the logo have already spent most of their disposable income this year on ammo. 

     

     

  7. 28 minutes ago, BuraddoRun said:

    I thought Shatterstar was cool when I was younger. C'mon, he's got a double-bladed sword! That's XXtreme!!!

    Also, feet!

    feet.jpg

    Wait, so Shatterstar above has feet...and very few pouches.

    The Shatterstar in the original artwork for auction has no feet...and yet...many pouches.  >shudder< WHAT'S IN ALL THOSE POUCHES?

     

     

     

  8. This is a masterpiece, only not in the way the artist intended.

    https://www.ebay.com/itm/124355697122

    Every escalating detail in the description makes it almost glorious in its struggle to be even remotely related in any way to Jack Kirby. Chapeau bas, dude. I'm particularly fond of his use of the words "re-envisioned," "embellished," and "completed."  Although his covering all bases by ALSO coming out with a litho of this piece is a kind of genius.  Especially given that there's debate about whether Jack even drew the piece that he traced.