12¢ VFs at 50% of Guide

[blue808]

 

Avengers #50

[blue808]

 

Av 50

 

[Comcasthawk]

 

Avengers #50

 

[blue808]

 

Avengers #50

 

 

Foolkiller is just too fast

[joe_collector]

Jeez, are you guys hitting the refresh button 10 times a minute to get these books?

 

Talk about going fast!

 

I thought we ruled against this "quick reply" stuff and had to actually quote the message and scan?

[Foolkiller]

I'm not aware of such a rule. But then I don't monitor things all that carefully in that thread stickied.

[Comcasthawk]

Jeez, are you guys hitting the refresh button 10 times a minute to get these books?

 

Talk about going fast!

 

I thought we ruled against this "quick reply" stuff and had to actually quote the message and scan?

 

Never heard of that procedure. It doesn't matter to me though how a book is replied to. What is the call on this...

[Monkeyman]

Avengers 55 - F/VF Nice book with some tanning

SOLD to Annihilus

 

 

 

 

[joe_collector]

Okay folks, I may be opening a can of worms, but go back and clock in the referring link toi Foolkiller's posts, and he's replying to other books.

 

Like buying Av 50 by replying to a Avengers 49 post and buying Av 49 off an Avengers 43 post.

 

That's why I *thought* we required a full quote to stay away from this type of BS.

[Annihilus]

Avengers 55 - F/VF Nice book with some tanning

$12 (OSPG - $25)

 

 

 

 

[blue808]

[Foolkiller]

that's true. I don't really care if that's the rule, and I'm more than happy to forfeit any winnings if there is some sort of official ruling. Otherwise, then I'm going to keep going with my methods.

[joe_collector]

I'm not aware of such a rule. But then I don't monitor things all that carefully in that thread stickied.

 

It wouldn't be a big deal if you were actually replying to the posts of the books for sale, rather than just "quick replying" them in.

 

That's what caused all the furor in one of Nic's threads.

[Comcasthawk]

Okay folks, I may be opening a can of worms, but go back and clock in the referring link toi Foolkiller's posts, and he's replying to other books.

 

Like buying Av 50 by replying to a Avengers 49 post and buying Av 49 off an Avengers 43 post.

 

That's why I *thought* we required a full quote to stay away from this type of BS.

 

I'm sure Brian is not doing anything intentionally wrong, but I can understand your point.

[Monkeyman]

Quick break to get caught up.

 

Mike

[Foolkiller]

yes but JC -- was there ever an "official" decision on it. If there is a rule then I'll happily adhere to it.

[Foolkiller]

I'm not aware of such a rule. But then I don't monitor things all that carefully in that thread stickied.

 

It wouldn't be a big deal if you were actually replying to the posts of the books for sale, rather than just "quick replying" them in.

 

That's what caused all the furor in one of Nic's threads.

 

Also, if the seller in these threads objects to my methodology then I will likewise stop as well.

[Comcasthawk]

that's true. I don't really care if that's the rule, and I'm more than happy to forfeit any winnings if there is some sort of official ruling. Otherwise, then I'm going to keep going with my methods.

 

It's obvious that Brian(Foolkiller) is just trying to buy these books as fast as he can because of the pricing and the way we "buy and sell" through the internet. I don't think he should "give up" any books...........

[lizards2]

yes but JC -- was there ever an "official" decision on it. If there is a rule then I'll happily adhere to it.

 

No - you're seeing the books, typing in the book and issue number and the

 

Nothing wrong with that.

[joe_collector]

Also, if the seller in these threads objects to my methodology then I will likewise stop as well.

 

Hey, the problem was that EVERYONE was pulling this BS in a few hot selling threads, and it turned into total chaos.One guy started it, then two more, then ten, then everyone. No one knew up from down at one point.

 

That's why you need common sense in this kind of thing, otherwise it's anarchy.