PGM FF #63... Update...back scan added

[DCman]

Book is very fresh, with a clean back cover and OW/W pages.

 

What do you think?

 

[/img]

 

[/img]

[gernblanston]

Nice book: 9.0

[joeypost]

9.0/9.2 nice book (thumbs u

[TFL-migration]

Solid 9.0 Soft 9.2

[bronzilla]

I thought the Fantastic Four #63 2 cent variant was a myth?

Seriously the Miswrap shouldnt hurt too much. One of the difficultys finding books from this era is so many dang black covers. This one survived well.

9.2

[divad]

Actually, the miswrap is huge - even if it doesn't affect the CGC numerical grade, there are many a collector who would not even consider it. This copy is miscut and miswrapped just about everywhere it can be

[osborn_fr]

9.4

[Mr. Zipper]

Sweet book. 9.2

[Dick Pontoon]

Actually, the miswrap is huge - even if it doesn't affect the CGC numerical grade, there are many a collector who would not even consider it. This copy is miscut and miswrapped just about everywhere it can be

 

Don't give it short shrift - there's the legion of Arvel Omics Roup collectors!

 

I'm joking of course, but I wouldn't be surprised if somebody does collect miswraps.

 

Very nice book! 9.2 as presented.

[brasseye]

Sweet book. 9.2

 

Ditto.

 

 

[divad]

Actually, the miswrap is huge - even if it doesn't affect the CGC numerical grade, there are many a collector who would not even consider it. This copy is miscut and miswrapped just about everywhere it can be

 

Don't give it short shrift - there's the legion of Arvel Omics Roup collectors!

 

I'm joking of course, but I wouldn't be surprised if somebody does collect miswraps.

 

Very nice book! 9.2 as presented.

 

My guess offhand is . . . that a BC scan would lower everyone's grade

[nik]

This type of mis-wrap I can live with, its the back to front that bugs me the most.

[divad]

This type of mis-wrap I can live with, its the back to front that bugs me the most.

 

The white strip at the spine bothers you . . . but the white strip at the REFC doesn't?

[nik]

Not so much

[Mr.Diggler]

9.2, may have a mis wrap but still looks good...........

[burntboy]

9.2, may have a mis wrap but still looks good...........

 

I agree that the technical grade appears to be a 9.2, but without a BC scan, one can't be sure............

 

those who love well-centered books might be turned off by the miswrap.......and i suppose there are those who don't care. David's point about the possibility of a lower grade with a BC scan is a good one, however. the possibility of color breaking spine nicks is definitely heightened by the colored FC slipping onto the back edge.

 

sweet looking book....... (thumbs u

[topofthetotem]

9.4

[burntboy]

after seeing the BC scan, i'll stick with my original guess of 9.2. that's quite a bit of miswrap, but these old eyes can't find any nicks in it, at all.............

[rza808]

This looks better condition wise than the one I gave Comicdey @ 9.2 so I'll go 9.2/9.4

[gernblanston]

I will stick at 9.0. The miswrap is pronounced and has to count, but it is a solid book and, for me, would be higher without the miswrap.