PGM Hulk #1

[Mr. Zipper]

Lots of wear and accumulation of small/moderate defects. Nothing missing, nice paper quality and tight clean staples.

 

Poll implemented to keep grades within realm of reality. If you think the grade falls above or below the poll options, you are wrong.

 

 

 

 

[silverage12c]

I went with 2.5 . . . too many creases to go any higher, I think.

[marvelcollector]

I went with 3.0...nice colors help to nudge it to G/VG....

[divad]

If you think the grade falls above or below the poll options, you are wrong.

 

9.6

[Mr. Zipper]

If you think the grade falls above or below the poll options, you are wrong.

 

9.6

 

[eddly]

2.0

 

 

[Mr. Zipper]

2.0

 

 

I bought this from a well-known dealer in 1993. Later I'll reveal what he graded it. Although, in all fairness, the scale has tightened up since then at least a full point.

[Dark Knight]

I voted 2.0 too.. Too many creases and wear going on

[joeypost]

2.0/2.5

[fanfourforever]

If you think the grade falls above or below the poll options, you are wrong.

 

9.6

 

Yup, high as a kite.

[burntboy]

i'm thinking a 2.5 due to the long creases and the BC has issues. still nice bright colors.............. (thumbs u

[piper]

3.0

[eddly]

2.0

 

 

I bought this from a well-known dealer in 1993. Later I'll reveal what he graded it. Although, in all fairness, the scale has tightened up since then at least a full point.

 

Let me guess, he graded it 4.0/4.5?

[JohnT]

2.5 for me.

[Point Five]

2.5 seems just right. Great colors!

[homerwannabee]

I voted 2.5. The back cover has too many flaws to grade higher.

[oakman29]

i voted 2.0 there is alot going on to grade higher

[Mr. Zipper]

2.0

 

 

I bought this from a well-known dealer in 1993. Later I'll reveal what he graded it. Although, in all fairness, the scale has tightened up since then at least a full point.

 

Let me guess, he graded it 4.0/4.5?

 

4.0

 

That said, in the first OSGG, there are a few VGs that are somewhat comparable to this book.

 

In my view, I figured it was probably a minimum 2.0, maybe a 2.5. Given that 2.5 is a leading vote getter, it seems like that is a fair grade.

 

BTW, the back doesn't have the dirt that seems to be on the scan. The scan really amped up some rather minor soiling. Looks much better in hand.

[eddly]

If that is the case, then we are grading it too harshly

[airwalker]

Looks pretty close to this copy that recently sold on Heritage.