PGM CA 109

[NuffSaid57]

Looking for a few opinions on whether I am being conservative enough/too conservative grading books like this at 2.0 Aside from obvious moisture damage to FC/BC and last couple of pages this book is in not beat all to smithereens . Books like Paula's copy that I was not the original owner of will be the first I may be willing to let go and I want to make sure I grade them fairly. I would love to own a high grade copy of this book someday.

 

Larger 469K image: http://www.pbase.com/bjorn_b/image/93851366/original.jpg

 

 

Not sure what is going on with my scanner, but the light areas near the bottom of the BC reflect the worst moisture damage and are not near as light as reflected in this image.

 

 

 

 

 

[TheAvenger80]

Hmmm. The book looks solid, probably a 6.0 or so without the water damage. How much does the water damage bring it down? Now that I'm not very well schooled on, so someone else take it away...

[Point Five]

Looks generally VG-ish from the outside. I'd guess 2.5/3.0 range, assuming the interior stains you mention aren't too large or distracting.

[CAP Freak]

2.5

[TFL-migration]

2.5

[burntboy]

Looks generally VG-ish from the outside. I'd guess 2.5/3.0 range, assuming the interior stains you mention aren't too large or distracting.

 

I tend to often agree with point Five's grades and comments and this is one of those times.............

[gernblanston]

3.0 for Paula's former book