WTB: WALKING DEAD pages with Zombies!

[TylerH]

Hello!

I would like a good walking dead page with Zombies in it!

if you have any for sale, please send a scan or photo, and price to me:

 

PM for email address!

Thanks!

[Pitboss]

[EvilAsh]

Best of luck Tyler, check out the reply I made in the regular comic art forum

 

--Steve

[DrWatson]

You may not want to post your e-mail address. You can always PM it to someone.

[MutantKeys]

1 million dollars

 

http://www.comicartfans.com/GalleryPiece.asp?Piece=347295&GSub=54384

[DrWatson]

That would look great if it were in color...

[MutantKeys]

[OldGuy]

That would look great if it were in color...

 

I know you're just giving MK a hard time, but I must say, some comics need to be B&W and TWD is one of those. It would lose much of what it has to offer if it were in color. That's one of the reasons I love the original art from this series so much. i think the OA actually looks better then the finished product (after the gray toning/inking).

[TylerH]

Thanks Dr - Email removed!

 

[Nexus]

That would look great if it were in color...

 

I know you're just giving MK a hard time, but I must say, some comics need to be B&W and TWD is one of those. It would lose much of what it has to offer if it were in color. That's one of the reasons I love the original art from this series so much. i think the OA actually looks better then the finished product (after the gray toning/inking).

 

Agree 100%. Some books just work better in b/w. As an example, V FOR VENDETTA was originally published in b/w during its initial run in WARRIOR. WARRIOR was a b/w mag, so it's not like they had a choice, but the b/w art fit the story perfectly. DC colored it later and it looks "off". The difference between the early b/w OA and the OA from the last two issues (which were drawn with coloring in mind) is a stark contrast as well,

 

Back to WD...anyone else here prefer Adlard to Moore? I know I'm in a minority, but I never really got how Moore's stuff is valued that much more than Adlard's. Moore has a cartoony style that fits books like FEAR AGENT and EXTERMINATORS. It does not fit WD the same way as Adlard's does. For example, I don't think Moore would have been as successful with the graphic execution scene a couple of issues ago. Hopefully, in time, Adlard gets his due.

[brandolsn]

Back to WD...anyone else here prefer Adlard to Moore? I know I'm in a minority, but I never really got how Moore's stuff is valued that much more than Adlard's. Moore has a cartoony style that fits books like FEAR AGENT and EXTERMINATORS. It does not fit WD the same way as Adlard's does. For example, I don't think Moore would have been as successful with the graphic execution scene a couple of issues ago. Hopefully, in time, Adlard gets his due.

I'm with you (thumbs u

[sterlingcomics]

Adlard has grown on me...and I see + and - with both artists. I think Moore draws better Zombies from a detail perspective, but Adlard is no slouch either. I perfer Adlard's interpretation of the characters...but I like Moore's Lori better than Adlard. Moore's big honking nose on her gave her a distinct look that was lost in the Adlard interpretation.