PGM Rangers Comics #12

[hockey&comicsguy]

Most glaring defects: Chip out of bottom and top edge front cover. 1/4" tear top of front cover. Small tear top of back cover.

 

 

[snitzer]

No love for this sweet book? Shame

 

6.5-7.0 and

[JohnT]

That is a sweet one!

 

6.5 due to the defects.

[143ksk]

7.0, maybe 7.5

[Point Five]

Question about this one. The spine corner chips on this very pretty book make this a tough one for me to grade. Are you guys thinking that both of the missing bits are bindery chips, with little or no effect on grade...and if so, how do you make that call? Love to know a bit more here.

 

(Gorgeous book BTW!)

[143ksk]

I think both spine chips (and maybe even the back cover tear) are likely to be production defects. I mostly make that call based on location and type of damage. What are the odds that a chip occured in that area that was not production related? It's just a weird place for damage to occur due to normal wear and tear.

[hockey&comicsguy]

Question about this one. The spine corner chips on this very pretty book make this a tough one for me to grade. Are you guys thinking that both of the missing bits are bindery chips, with little or no effect on grade...and if so, how do you make that call? Love to know a bit more here.

 

(Gorgeous book BTW!)

 

I believe the chip on the bottom is a bindery issue. The rest is wear and tear.

 

PS: For those who would like to know, this is the Rockford copy. My first one from this ped.

[JWKyle]

A 6.0 nice book what was the advertised grade when you bought it?