• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Dime Novels/Pulp Novels

6 posts in this topic

Hey, this is my first post in the GA comic section of the forum and was wondering if you guys could help answer a novice's question.

 

What distinguishes dime novels from pulp novels? My understanding is that dime novels were written primarily for young men with various content, typically adventure stories or tales of the Wild West. Don't pulp novels cover much the same ground?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dime novels were also printed a bit differently... in appearance they were more like a small newspaper, or leaflet, only rarely being thick enough to warrant a lettered spine. The pulp as we know it didn't come about until around 1898 or so, when some general information type magazines switched to fiction formats. Argosy, All-Story Weekly, Youth's Companion, and a few others came along, then in the 19teens, genre specific magazines came along, like Flynn's Detective Weekly, Adventure, and in 1923 Weird Tales, Black Mask Detective, and so on, came on the scene, and from there, by the mid-thirties, you had sci-fi, horror, adventure, the Spicy line, and so on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IIRC, and someone like Scrooge knows more than me, but I believe dime novels predated pulps. Dime novels started in the 1800s and died out in the early pulp days.

 

Thanks for the vote of confidence but it's probably undeserved here. I think Cimm covered it fairly well and I am sure the Wikipedia entry is fine.

 

To me the biggest difference is not re-the content but the format. In addition to Cimm's mentions, dime novels generally only had the cover illustrated and the interior was nothing but tight text. Pulp does differentiate itself by the type of fiction involved which is indeed less juvenile in nature. In the end, there is no clear distinction and we're moving along a continuum. In fact, it's not really until the mid- to late-20's, some 20 years after what we consider pulp started being published that the term pulps became common-place.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites