ASM 12 - beware the back cover!

[TheUrologist]

By docparnes at 2012-04-11

 

By docparnes at 2012-04-11

[oakman29]

6.5/7.0

[excelsior1986]

6.5

 

Whats wrong with the back cover?

[Ditch Fahrenheit]

6.0

[TheUrologist]

I think the front cover is 7.5 worthy. Back cover drops it over a point easy IMO

[Buzzetta]

6.0-6.5

 

I have three copies of this book in my possession- 8.0, 4.5 and a 3.0

 

The front cover is maybe a full grade below the 8.0 and the back cover looks slightly higher than my 4.5.

 

It is tough with the yellow covers because I believe the yellow covers hide imperfections easier than any other color cover.

[Aces]

Back not too bad. It could press out to a 7.0

 

6.5 as is.

[Primetime]

5.5

[ImperiusRex]

I was thinking 7.0 as well...Back cover isn't shockworthy at all. Looks good (Thumbs u

[TheUrologist]

That store stamp is horrendous, bleeds through and all the little tears make the back of this book far less presentable compared to the front. If this book was 7.0 worthy I'd be more apt to have it graded, but I fear I'd get a 6.0 at best which I dont need.