X-Men #1

[JBhutto]

Can't get scans but maybe these pics will be good enough. There's about a 2" horizontal tear on the back cover. A few of the inner pages have that tear like in the 3rd pic.

 

 

 

 

[roulette44]

2.5

[tjanse]

2.0

[Columbia Comics]

Nope; not a 2.5 and not a 2.0

 

It's a 1.5 to 1.8.

[Flaming_Telepath]

1.8 (thumbs u

[DR.X]

Nope; not a 2.5 and not a 2.0

 

It's a 1.5 to 1.8.

 

+1

 

Just too many things going on the front and back covers. 1.8 tops.

[ROBTOTHEC]

Since I have seen CGC 2.0's looking worse than this I am going to say this is possibly a 2.0!

[oakman29]

Nope; not a 2.5 and not a 2.0

 

It's a 1.5 to 1.8.

 

+1

 

Just too many things going on the front and back covers. 1.8 tops.

+2 (thumbs u

[Eddy707]

I have a friend who has a CGC SS 1.5 that looks exactly like this expect the cover is more white than cream. I agree with those that have said 1.5 to 1,8, with my opinion being closer to a 1.5.

[etanick]

i will go with 1.8, just too much wears all around and that big tear but it wouldn't shock me to see it in a 2.0 slab.

[NuffSaid57]

1.5/2.0

[JBhutto]

Thanks for the infos fellows.

[roulette44]

1.5/2.0

[youmechooz]

ahh your the person in alabama trying to sell 1-10 plus gsx 1 for 5500 arent you?

 

edit: nope your not the same sorry looked the same excepth the stamps on the cover

[The_Captain]

1.8 (thumbs u

 

(thumbs u

[Aces]

1.8

[Kevin.J]

1.5

 

[gradejunky]

+1 on the 1.8...damage too significant with the tears and all.

[Columbia Comics]

1.5/2.0

 

Guess you needed a regrade huh?