• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Daredevil # 1 CGC 9.2 OWW (1964) Tremont copy *CLOSED*

Started by VintageComics,

37 posts in this topic

roulette44

roulette44

Posted
Posted

-SPEEDY, feeling a bit sheepish after last night :blush:

 

lol

 

It's a Jewish treasure made possible by Stanley Lieber and Jacob Kurtzberg.

 

:o

:headbang: my peeps!!! :headbang:

 

me too (now where is the emoticon with a little yellow guy wearing a yamaca (skull cap) , and talis (shoulder cover shaul)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gotham Kid

Gotham Kid

Posted
Posted
Is this the RAW copy listed on Metro (as a VFNM 9.0 IIRC) a while back that subsequently got slabbed ?

 

Probably best if you ask these kind of questions via PM first?

 

My bad. Apologies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VintageComics

VintageComics

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Popularity likely due to new movie in the early works.. ;)

 

I thought you were joking.

 

:o

 

I guess Fox is wanting to keep the rights.

 

 

Don't get your hopes too high... When a studio makes a movie just to retain rights, bad things are produced.

too true :(

 

Ultimately, it would be in the company's best interest to produce a decent movie.

 

Personally, I enjoyed the first movie as it was decent for the time period (almost 10 years old now).

I guess I'd have to question why they would retain the rights for a character if they weren't planning on making money with him, and a lot has changed in 10 years...it's been proven that a good Superhero movie can make a lot of money and they are in the business of making money through movies, right?

 

So if I owned a piece of the Marvel pie and had the opportunity to produce a movie that has the possibility of earning millions, why wouldn't I?

 

I don't know much about the movie making process but the fact that they have a decent director chosen (David Slade) doesn't hurt.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Speedy-D

Speedy-D

Posted
Posted
Popularity likely due to new movie in the early works.. ;)

 

I thought you were joking.

 

:o

 

I guess Fox is wanting to keep the rights.

 

 

Don't get your hopes too high... When a studio makes a movie just to retain rights, bad things are produced.

too true :(

 

Ultimately, it would be in the company's best interest to produce a decent movie.

 

Personally, I enjoyed the first movie as it was decent for the time period (almost 10 years old now).

I guess I'd have to question why they would retain the rights for a character if they weren't planning on making money with him, and a lot has changed in 10 years...it's been proven that a good Superhero movie can make a lot of money and they are in the business of making money through movies, right?

 

So if I owned a piece of the Marvel pie and had the opportunity to produce a movie that has the possibility of earning millions, why wouldn't I?

 

I don't know much about the movie making process but the fact that they have a decent director chosen (David Slade) doesn't hurt.

 

I think, to retain the rights, they have to make a movie within a certain timeframe. So, this becomes the driving factor behind the movie's release, as opposed to a great -script, finding the right director/star, etc. It just opens things up for crappiness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VintageComics

VintageComics

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Popularity likely due to new movie in the early works.. ;)

 

I thought you were joking.

 

:o

 

I guess Fox is wanting to keep the rights.

 

 

Don't get your hopes too high... When a studio makes a movie just to retain rights, bad things are produced.

too true :(

 

Ultimately, it would be in the company's best interest to produce a decent movie.

 

Personally, I enjoyed the first movie as it was decent for the time period (almost 10 years old now).

I guess I'd have to question why they would retain the rights for a character if they weren't planning on making money with him, and a lot has changed in 10 years...it's been proven that a good Superhero movie can make a lot of money and they are in the business of making money through movies, right?

 

So if I owned a piece of the Marvel pie and had the opportunity to produce a movie that has the possibility of earning millions, why wouldn't I?

 

I don't know much about the movie making process but the fact that they have a decent director chosen (David Slade) doesn't hurt.

 

I think, to retain the rights, they have to make a movie within a certain timeframe. So, this becomes the driving factor behind the movie's release, as opposed to a great -script, finding the right director/star, etc. It just opens things up for crappiness.

 

Yeah, but if you're a company that has money (and Fox does) why spend $50MIL to make a couple of $MIL when it's proven that doing it right can make $100MILs?

 

Why not spend $250MIL to make $250MIL?

 

I mean, they are in the business to make money aren't they?

 

Good quality stuff always sells well. That's what people seem to forget.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VintageComics

VintageComics

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Folks, I'm going to drop the price to $7500. This is a one time reduction.

 

(thumbs u

 

Hey gang, got a book up for sale in case anyone is interested. Apparently a very popular book right now. Book comes from the Tremont collection which was a very nice collection of Silver and Bronze age books. Book was pressed. Exhibits nice cover whites and page quality. No markings on the book. Asking price is $8500 $7500 Drop me a PM with any questions or comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Racer-X

Racer-X

Posted
Posted

-SPEEDY, feeling a bit sheepish after last night :blush:

 

lol

 

It's a Jewish treasure made possible by Stanley Lieber and Jacob Kurtzberg.

 

:o

:headbang: my peeps!!! :headbang:

 

me too (now where is the emoticon with a little yellow guy wearing a yamaca (skull cap) , and talis (shoulder cover shaul)

 

it's "yarmulke"...oy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Go to topic listing