RARE...EERIE #1 Magazine Grade & Scarcity Opinions ???

[RedRaven]

Please somebody , shoot this thread.

[goldust40]

For shame.....and to think the most interesting Mag Topic (I'm being serious, btw) there is has to be shunted to the ghetto that is the Magazine Forum.

[awe4one]

For shame.....and to think the most interesting Mag Topic (I'm being serious, btw) there is has to be shunted to the ghetto that is the Magazine Forum.

 

Ghetto?

 

I don't care either way but there is a magazine section for a reason....

 

Jim

[goldust40]

For shame.....and to think the most interesting Mag Topic (I'm being serious, btw) there is has to be shunted to the ghetto that is the Magazine Forum.

 

Ghetto?

 

I don't care either way but there is a magazine section for a reason....

 

Jim

 

I agree...... oh yeah, "ghetto" was a bit strong. Although this thread was as much about magazine history as anything.

[ArAich]

I agree...... oh yeah, "ghetto" was a bit strong.

 

Mayhap "Nether regions" would'st be more appropriate....

[RedRaven]

Ive recreated the pertinent posts in the mag fourm sans the comments from the peanut gallery. No offense to the gallery.

[Illiterati-migration]

I agree...... oh yeah, "ghetto" was a bit strong.

 

Mayhap "Nether regions" would'st be more appropriate....

 

You're always looking to stick stuff in your "nether regions".

[Illiterati-migration]

Ive recreated the pertinent posts in the mag fourm sans the comments from the peanut gallery. No offense to the gallery.

 

For the record, I thought it was a fascinating thread and I was very interested in what you had to say... even though I --

 

 

[ultimatevenom]

Ive recreated the pertinent posts in the mag fourm sans the comments from the peanut gallery. No offense to the gallery.

 

For the record, I thought it was a fascinating thread and I was very interested in what you had to say... even though I --

 

 

 

You're not supposed to be here...oh wait neither am i

[goldust40]

I agree...... oh yeah, "ghetto" was a bit strong.

 

Mayhap "Nether regions" would'st be more appropriate....

 

'Pon further rumination I am indeed in accord with your suggestion, my liege.

[MK Ultra]

Would it have been okay if "OT" was put in with the title too?

 

Or, is it okay since Eerie, and Creepy are in the Overstreet COMIC BOOK price guide?

[deathlok]

Would it have been okay if "OT" was put in with the title too?

 

Or, is it okay since Eerie, and Creepy are in the Overstreet COMIC BOOK price guide?

 

It would have been okay in the Magazine Forum..

[Affordable 2nd Thoughts Inc.]

Ok , I have added a compilation of my posts to the original message in the Mag fourm. If anybody has anything else to add please do so there.

 

Thank You for the Effort and Info My Friend. It is good to see someone focused on the questions and topic at hand.

[inconceivable]

Would it have been okay if "OT" was put in with the title too?

 

Or, is it okay since Eerie, and Creepy are in the Overstreet COMIC BOOK price guide?

 

It would have been okay in the Magazine Forum..

 

I would also add that Eerie #1 was a comic book. At least size-wise? What is the difference between a small magazine and a comic book?

 

Dan

[Affordable 2nd Thoughts Inc.]

Would it have been okay if "OT" was put in with the title too?

 

Or, is it okay since Eerie, and Creepy are in the Overstreet COMIC BOOK price guide?

 

It would have been okay in the Magazine Forum..

 

I would also add that Eerie #1 was a comic book. At least size-wise? What is the difference between a small magazine and a comic book?

 

Dan

 

Good Point!

[valiantman]

There's no way that book (counterfeit or not) would get a high grade (9.0+)...

The bottom half of the spine looks like someone rolled it vertically... or horizontally...

whichever one causes multiple spine creases.

[ultimatevenom]

Would it have been okay if "OT" was put in with the title too?

 

Or, is it okay since Eerie, and Creepy are in the Overstreet COMIC BOOK price guide?

 

It would have been okay in the Magazine Forum..

 

I would also add that Eerie #1 was a comic book. At least size-wise? What is the difference between a small magazine and a comic book?

 

Dan

 

One of them should go in the magazine threads

[Affordable 2nd Thoughts Inc.]

There's no way that book (counterfeit or not) would get a high grade (9.0+)...

The bottom half of the spine looks like someone rolled it vertically... or horizontally...

whichever one causes multiple spine creases.

 

Looking at both Close-Up front and rear scans what would you put it as?

[deathlok]

There's no way that book (counterfeit or not) would get a high grade (9.0+)...

The bottom half of the spine looks like someone rolled it vertically... or horizontally...

whichever one causes multiple spine creases.

 

Looking at both Close-Up front and rear scans what would you put it as?

 

something that belongs in the Magazine forum.

[ultimatevenom]

There's no way that book (counterfeit or not) would get a high grade (9.0+)...

The bottom half of the spine looks like someone rolled it vertically... or horizontally...

whichever one causes multiple spine creases.

 

Looking at both Close-Up front and rear scans what would you put it as?

 

something that belongs in the Magazine forum.

 

 

Nice one Deathlok Senior