CGC Acquires Classics Inc - Response to your Questions

[pickycollector]

Somewhere, RMA is smiling . . .

 

[Thomas Nielsen]

Somewhere, RMA is smiling . . .

[GACollectibles]

EMBO money-grubbers.

 

eat my buffalo's ovaries

 

Emo moms barf oreos

[seanfingh]

EMBO money-grubbers.

 

eat my buffalo's ovaries

 

Emo moms barf oreos

 

Every Mass. boy overcompensates

[DiceX]

1. Maybe CGC should put the grade the book may have been in prior to being pressed. In their best estimation.

 

2. I know someone pressing who uses a release paper that has no coating whatsoever.

 

3. This thread contains more butthurt than RMA's first 26,419 posts combined.

 

4. None of you have ever been laid.

 

 

 

[Comicdey]

Dear Mods,

 

I love the "Ignore" option. However, it cannot prevent me to read posts from those that I have on Ignore when they are quoted by others. Is there any way to have an Ignore function that works all the time ?

 

That post made me laugh....

 

What's good for the goose ::

 

Is good for the gander

 

 

 

[seanfingh]

1. Maybe CGC should put the grade the book may have been in prior to being pressed. In their best estimation.

 

2. I know someone pressing who uses a release paper that has no coating whatsoever.

 

3. This thread contains more butthurt than RMA's first 26,419 posts combined.

 

4. None of you have ever been laid.

 

 

 

Nico Esq wants to know why you can't just be nice.

[InvstmntComcSuply]

If we can submit questions. Here are two I would like addressed:

 

Now that CGC has an in house conservation service, will CGC change its stance on non-archival tape? Specifically the increasing of universal grades when non-archival tape is used to re-attach covers, centerfolds, etc to a book. This grading loophole has promoted the highly destructive practice of adding new tape in an attempt to increase the CGC grade.

 

If CGC is not altering its stance, will the in house conservation service be actively promoting this highly destructive practice?

[Bookery]

This is the device:

 

 

 

Oh what new forms of Hell will we devise for our funny books?

 

 

That thing is fake. It is a painted electric drill with two parts of a Norelco shaver stuck to it.

 

He didn't want to scare any of you potential customers away, but you discovered the ruse. This is the real laser that will be used...

 

 

 

[Comicdey]

If we can submit questions. Here are two I would like addressed:

 

Now that CGC has an in house conservation service, will CGC change its stance on non-archival tape? Specifically the increasing of universal grades when non-archival tape is used to re-attach covers, centerfolds, etc to a book. This grading loophole has promoted the highly destructive practice of adding new tape in an attempt to increase the CGC grade.

 

If CGC is not altering its stance, will the in house conservation service be actively promoting this highly destructive practice?

 

If anything. Maybe they could lighten their stance on archival tape. Who's to say a kid didn't randomly get lucky with his tape purchase.

[mackenzie999]

...and along those lines, will they disclose their own pressing as part of the book's notes? If someone presses a book via CGC, then sells it, then the next person sells it, then I buy it, will the pressing info still be available (assuming it ever was in the first place)?

[DiceX]

1. Maybe CGC should put the grade the book may have been in prior to being pressed. In their best estimation.

 

2. I know someone pressing who uses a release paper that has no coating whatsoever.

 

3. This thread contains more butthurt than RMA's first 26,419 posts combined.

 

4. None of you have ever been laid.

 

 

 

Nico Esq wants to know why you can't just be nice.

 

I was being nice.

 

 

[seanfingh]

1. Maybe CGC should put the grade the book may have been in prior to being pressed. In their best estimation.

 

2. I know someone pressing who uses a release paper that has no coating whatsoever.

 

3. This thread contains more butthurt than RMA's first 26,419 posts combined.

 

4. None of you have ever been laid.

 

 

 

Nico Esq wants to know why you can't just be nice.

 

I was being nice.

 

 

Don't press your luck.

[pickycollector]

3. This thread contains more butthurt than RMA's first 26,419 posts combined.

No thread can be that bad

[DiceX]

1. Maybe CGC should put the grade the book may have been in prior to being pressed. In their best estimation.

 

2. I know someone pressing who uses a release paper that has no coating whatsoever.

 

3. This thread contains more butthurt than RMA's first 26,419 posts combined.

 

4. None of you have ever been laid.

 

 

 

Nico Esq wants to know why you can't just be nice.

 

I was being nice.

 

 

Don't press your luck.

 

If I did, you'd never be able to detect it.

 

 

[comicwiz]

1. Maybe CGC should put the grade the book may have been in prior to being pressed. In their best estimation.

 

2. I know someone pressing who uses a release paper that has no coating whatsoever.

 

3. This thread contains more butthurt than RMA's first 26,419 posts combined.

 

4. None of you have ever been laid.

 

 

 

Nico Esq wants to know why you can't just be nice.

 

I was being nice.

 

 

Too bad you snapped the needle on the butthurt detector.

[drbanner]

...and along those lines, will they disclose their own pressing as part of the book's notes? If someone presses a book via CGC, then sells it, then the next person sells it, then I buy it, will the pressing info still be available (assuming it ever was in the first place)?

 

Good question! (thumbs u

[seanfingh]

 

People that disclose will still disclose, and those that don't, still won't.

[batman_fan]

...and along those lines, will they disclose their own pressing as part of the book's notes? If someone presses a book via CGC, then sells it, then the next person sells it, then I buy it, will the pressing info still be available (assuming it ever was in the first place)?

 

Good question! (thumbs u

 

I think in general the answer will be "NO". I don't think they will disclose anything done through Matt's hands. Should they? I would say no. It is up to whoever submits the book to decide what to disclose.

[Jeffro.]

EMBO money-grubbers.

 

eat my buffalo's ovaries

close, but no butt plug

 

Eat My Butt Orifice?

 

 

Examine My Butt Orifice?