• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

PGM Captain Marvel #1

11 posts in this topic

I'll go 7.5 IMHO! smiley-gen130.gif

Assuming the top of the front cover is just impact damage and not a tear!

 

No tear. But I still think you are loosening up a bit. You used to grade very tight up till some results started coming back from CGC.

 

I'm not complaining, just sayin...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll go 7.5 IMHO! smiley-gen130.gif

Assuming the top of the front cover is just impact damage and not a tear!

 

No tear. But I still think you are loosening up a bit. You used to grade very tight up till some results started coming back from CGC.

 

I'm not complaining, just sayin...

Yes ff! You are very observant and are right! I was noticing that the more recent CGC grading is somewhat looser than it was in the past.

 

I was hoping that my grading would be more in line with what someone could expect to get from CGC. That is not to say that I approve of the "looser grading" standards that they seem to be producing lately.

My true grading standards I would say are more in line with how CGC use to grade, more along the lines of the Overstreet Grading Guide. smiley-gen130.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites