PGM - ASM #300 Copy A

[media_junkie]

Just want to get the boards opinion on this since it is a key book.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

[He11blazer]

Based on what I can see - multiple very small spine ticks and soft corners - I would guess 9.4

 

The choppy right hand edge is a production issue common to ASM #300, and from my experience CGC do not consider it a defect.

[HighStakesComics]

8.5. Corners are very slightly worn. There are also a few color breaks to the right of the game on the back cover, and we also have a few spine ticks. The production defect on the right is of no issue. I'd bump to 9.2 if the color breaks were just dust, hair, scanner issues; etc. Nice book either way and always in demand. Good luck!

[He11blazer]

Interesting. When I say 9.4 I'm giving a guess at what CGC would give it, based on what is visible. In truth, I've seen CGC 9.8s with worse spine ticks. Not that I think that's OK in 9.8, but I thought the aim here was to predict the CGC grade. CGC 9.4, I bet.

 

Still, it is very hard to judge from a scan alone.

[Incredible Pulp]

wow 8.5 to 9.2

 

I have experience selling these. Black back covers are always subject to scuffing, and even the smallest spine tick looks enormous against that black environment.

 

The fron has a little wear and there is a spine tick on the back so with all that, I would give it a _______________

 

 

VF/NM to NM- no 8.5 here (thumbs u

[uchiha101]

9.2

[FormerReader]

8.5 due to the amount of color breaking spine ticks.

[media_junkie]

Thank you all for the feedback.

[fastballspecial]

8.5. Corners are very slightly worn. There are also a few color breaks to the right of the game on the back cover, and we also have a few spine ticks. The production defect on the right is of no issue. I'd bump to 9.2 if the color breaks were just dust, hair, scanner issues; etc. Nice book either way and always in demand. Good luck!

 

+1

 

 

[Jester Hats]

Right at a 9.0