Be cautious of this seller if you're looking at these

[12cents-migration]

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6508003402

 

He has AF15 and Spidey 1 up for sale with 0 feedback. I emailed him to ask if I could get a larger pic and if I can pick up the AF 15 if I won since he has no feedback and he lives 20 minutes from me and here's his response:

 

"No can't pick it up, prefer payment via paypal. Only pic that I have at this moment"

 

I emailed him back asking why I couldn't pick it up since it'll probably go for a fair bit of money and he has 0 feedback but find this suspicious so any of you on here looking at these may want to know this beforehand.

[Rob]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

[Silver Surfer]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

[Dr_Neff]

 

I don't buy Canadians either - too much meat!

[12cents-migration]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

What's wrong with us?

[jordanscott]

yer just jealous because you're not Canadian......

[divad]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

What's wrong with us?

 

I dunno, maybe it's cuz:

 

Masturbating Canadian wins court challenge

 

OTTAWA (Reuters) - A Canadian who masturbated at a window in his house has won his appeal against a conviction for indecency after Canada's top court ruled there was no evidence of intent to commit an indecent act, and a home was not a public place.

 

 

The Supreme Court of Canada noted that British Columbian, Daryl Clark, had agreed it was an indecent act to have masturbated "in an illuminated room near an uncovered window visible to neighbours."

 

 

But Justice Morris Fish, writing the 9-0 decision, said such acts have to be done in public places to be a crime -- and a home was not a public place. The law also says indecent acts are only crimes in every location if the person intends to give offence.

 

 

Clark was convicted of an indecent act in a public place and given a four-month sentence after a prosecution that followed complaints from his neighbour, named in court documents only as Mrs. S.

 

 

The woman said she spotted Clark while she was watching television with her two young daughters in their family room.

 

 

She alerted her husband, and the couple observed Clark from their darkened bedroom for 10 or 15 minutes -- also using binoculars and a telescope -- before summoning the police, who said the upper part of Clark's body was visible from just below the navel.

 

 

"In my respectful view, the trial judge ... erred in concluding that the appellant's living room had been converted by him into a public place simply because he could be seen through his living room window and, though he did not know this, was being watched by Mr. and Mrs. S. from the privacy of their own bedroom 90 to 150 feet away," Fish wrote.

 

 

The supreme court ordered that Clark be acquitted.

[Artboy99]

So what your mad about is that Canadians can masturbate in open view and not get charged with a crime.

 

Artboy99

[uclapeterg]

 

Masturbating Canadian wins court challenge

 

OTTAWA (Reuters) - She alerted her husband, and the couple observed Clark from their darkened bedroom for 10 or 15 minutes -- also using binoculars and a telescope -- before summoning the police, who said the upper part of Clark's body was visible from just below the navel.

 

 

 

Who really is more preverted in this case? The man masturbating or the two people who went to great lengths to "spy" on him "for 10 or 15 minutes -- also using binoculars and a telescope -- before summoning the police"

[divad]

So what your mad about is that Canadians can masturbate in open view and not get charged with a crime.

 

Artboy99

 

Uh, who's mad?

[divad]

 

Masturbating Canadian wins court challenge

 

OTTAWA (Reuters) - She alerted her husband, and the couple observed Clark from their darkened bedroom for 10 or 15 minutes -- also using binoculars and a telescope -- before summoning the police, who said the upper part of Clark's body was visible from just below the navel.

 

 

 

Who really is more preverted in this case? The man masturbating or the two people who went to great lengths to "spy" on him "for 10 or 15 minutes -- also using binoculars and a telescope -- before summoning the police"

 

Presumedly also Canadian

[nik]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

What's wrong with us?

IMHO Canadien strippers are the best

[12cents-migration]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

What's wrong with us?

IMHO Canadien strippers are the best

 

[DoubleCovaBrotha]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

What's wrong with us?

IMHO Canadien strippers are the best

 

 

Wasn't Pamela Anderson from Canada originally? I am too lazy to check.

[lou_fine]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

What's wrong with us?

IMHO Canadien strippers are the best

 

 

Wasn't Pamela Anderson from Canada originally? I am too lazy to check.

 

Yeah, originally from Vancouver Island on the west coast. Discovered by a "talent" scout at a B.C. Lions football game when the stadium cameras zoomed in on her and flashed a picture of her onto the stadium video screen during one of their camera sweeps of the fans in the stands.

 

Talk about being in the right place at the right time.

[DoubleCovaBrotha]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

What's wrong with us?

IMHO Canadien strippers are the best

 

 

Wasn't Pamela Anderson from Canada originally? I am too lazy to check.

 

Yeah, originally from Vancouver Island on the west coast. Discovered by a "talent" scout at a B.C. Lions football game when the stadium cameras zoomed in on her and flashed a picture of her onto the stadium video screen during one of their camera sweeps of the fans in the stands.

 

Talk about being in the right place at the right time.

 

Pamela Anderson or the camera?

[all4comics]

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6508003402

 

He has AF15 and Spidey 1 up for sale with 0 feedback. I emailed him to ask if I could get a larger pic and if I can pick up the AF 15 if I won since he has no feedback and he lives 20 minutes from me and here's his response:

 

"No can't pick it up, prefer payment via paypal. Only pic that I have at this moment"

 

I emailed him back asking why I couldn't pick it up since it'll probably go for a fair bit of money and he has 0 feedback but find this suspicious so any of you on here looking at these may want to know this beforehand.

 

He also lives near me and said the same thing??? I even said I would give cold cash? But he rather have Paypal? Stay away!

[skybolt]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

What's wrong with us?

 

Last year I purchased a raw X-men #101 listed as VF/NM by a Canadian seller for $55. I sent it to CGC and recieved a 9.4 score. Sold it 6 months later for $455 on eBay. for Canadian sellers.

[Silver Surfer]

I make it a rule not to buy from Canadians.

 

What's wrong with us?

 

I dunno, maybe it's cuz:

 

Masturbating Canadian wins court challenge

 

OTTAWA (Reuters) - A Canadian who masturbated at a window in his house has won his appeal against a conviction for indecency after Canada's top court ruled there was no evidence of intent to commit an indecent act, and a home was not a public place.

 

 

The Supreme Court of Canada noted that British Columbian, Daryl Clark, had agreed it was an indecent act to have masturbated "in an illuminated room near an uncovered window visible to neighbours."

 

 

But Justice Morris Fish, writing the 9-0 decision, said such acts have to be done in public places to be a crime -- and a home was not a public place. The law also says indecent acts are only crimes in every location if the person intends to give offence.

 

 

Clark was convicted of an indecent act in a public place and given a four-month sentence after a prosecution that followed complaints from his neighbour, named in court documents only as Mrs. S.

 

 

The woman said she spotted Clark while she was watching television with her two young daughters in their family room.

 

 

She alerted her husband, and the couple observed Clark from their darkened bedroom for 10 or 15 minutes -- also using binoculars and a telescope -- before summoning the police, who said the upper part of Clark's body was visible from just below the navel.

 

 

"In my respectful view, the trial judge ... erred in concluding that the appellant's living room had been converted by him into a public place simply because he could be seen through his living room window and, though he did not know this, was being watched by Mr. and Mrs. S. from the privacy of their own bedroom 90 to 150 feet away," Fish wrote.

 

 

The supreme court ordered that Clark be acquitted.

 

Divad your just bitter because you lost your case.