You gotta be Kull to grade this #1...

[bounty_coder]

Kull #1 with a Mullet

 

Front: 2 extremely minute spine ticks 1/32". Light fuzz to LL corner.

Back: No defects to note

 

 

[nik]

Cant open the link to the larger pic

[bounty_coder]

Cant open the link to the larger pic

 

NIkos! you always have trouble with my free hosted images! It works fine for me when I open it?!?!

 

Anyone else having trouble viewing my pics?

 

-bounty

[LastStarfighter]

I'm going to say 9.0. Hard to tell. The images come out fine, except they are kind of fuzzy with the focus. I'm saying 9.0 due to the staining on the back cover and very light spine wear.

[bounty_coder]

I'm going to say 9.0. Hard to tell. The images come out fine, except they are kind of fuzzy with the focus. I'm saying 9.0 due to the staining on the back cover and very light spine wear.

 

Yeah I might have to go out and get a scanner, but if you read my description of defects you can get a good idea of what is up with the books in conjunction with a slightly fuzzy pic. I labled all the defects that the books had under good inspection under bright light.

 

I was leaning towards a 9.4/9.6 on this guy, corners are square and completely sharp, literally the 2-3 spine ticks are only 1/32", that is all the wear that is there.

 

...I should invest in a scanner possibly

[divad]

Dial-up blues . . .

[sterlingcomics]

gonna say 9.2. The FC LRC looks rounded to me. The front scan is fuzzy!!

[bullseye]

9.2 perhaps, a better scan could swing it higher or lower by a couple tenths