• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Panel construction and Frank Miller
1 1

15 posts in this topic

 

As a kid, one of the things that pulled me into comics was the panel construction and sequencing of Miller's work on Daredevil. I remember one (#177?) where the reporter Ben Urich is in his office at the Daily Bugle and smoke from a cigarette from the bottom panel swirls up into the page entering every panel. Also many panel sequencing felt filmic. My question: since there is nothing new under the sun, who was doing this kind of panel work before Miller. I know of none, but I'm certainly not a student of comics like some of you are. 

Edited by NoMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, not panel work per se but back in the day Herriman's Krazy Kat was given free reign over the whole newspaper page and would frequently meander through the entire page. So the smoke throughout the page thing was something he would do as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the print Steranko sells where he tells an entire story in one panel. Image result for steranko print

This image is from the web but I have one too. He was fantastic to talk to about this print, his mastery of moving your eye where he wants it to go is amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Daredevil he used Bernard Krigstein's congruent panel breakdown technique.

krigstein.jpg

 

krigstein_css25.jpg

Edited by Ken Aldred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, NoMan said:

 

As a kid, one of the things that pulled me into comics was the panel construction and sequencing of Miller's work on Daredevil. I remember one (#177?) where the reporter Ben Urich is in his office at the Daily Bugle and smoke from a cigarette from the bottom panel swirls up into the page entering every panel. Also many panel sequencing felt filmic. My question: since there is nothing new under the sun, who was doing this kind of panel work before Miller. I know of none, but I'm certainly not a student of comics like some of you are. 

Miller took inspiration from many GA greats (as well as Anime if you can believe it - he had a fascination with Japanese culture) but you need to check out Will Eisner.

Eisner was light years ahead of most when it came to picture story telling and sometimes when you're looking at his panel layouts you'd swear it was Miller.

And I want to thank the GA crew for pointing this out to me as I did not realize it, being a GA noob at one time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, I always said you can tell how good an artist is by the way they draw hands.

Miller, Adams, Wrightson etc could all do amazing hands.

Another two tells that I look for are how an artist draws water and smoke. :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got beat to the punch, but yeah Will Eisner was a true master, bringing all kinds of new elements to the comic page.  His format necessitated some changes, particularly the front page being an actual part of the story much of the time.  Because of that, the title was generally worked into the art.  I have to thank the "old guys" (younger than I am now) that hung around the comic shop when I was getting into comics.  They pointed out the Kitchen Sink books and I've been a devout fan ever since.  I remember when Mr. Miller's Daredevil work was recommended, I thought it looked a lot like Mr. Eisner's stuff.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's kinda coming back to me: I find that I either LOVE Eisner stuff or HATE Eisner stuff.

When the Spirit gets down and dirty and gritty, it's the best. When it's funny like a MAD Magazine story, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eisner's post WW 2 Spirit Sections - my favourite Golden Age reading material.

I'm surprised it took a while for him to be mentioned.  I posted Krigstein's work, someone who doesn't get as much recognition as an influence on Miller's technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, NoMan said:

It's kinda coming back to me: I find that I either LOVE Eisner stuff or HATE Eisner stuff.

When the Spirit gets down and dirty and gritty, it's the best. When it's funny like a MAD Magazine story, not so much.

That was part of what I loved about him, his range.  Wally Wood and to a lesser extent, Harvey Kurtzman also come to mind as being able to do  both the dramatic and comedic equally well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. Good call. One of comics' masters of chiaroscuro.

Here's another example from Toth, which is very similar to a Frank Miller page with Spillane-like dialogue, and also predates Sin City...

Torpedo-10.jpg

And, Toth's Batman...

ffa838219535798e1212d4f0b628fbaa.jpg

Edited by Ken Aldred
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1