Grade My TOS#55

[Silver Surfer]

Sorry no back cover scan but let me know what you think.

 

[ericc123]

7.5

[uclapeterg]

7.5 as well. Nice cover!

[Norrin_Radd]

 

 

Great comic!

[divad]

7.5 as well. Nice cover!

Photos can be deceiving . . .

[Aces]

7.5

 

if the back cover is sharp maybe an 8.0.

[burntboy]

7.5

 

if the back cover is sharp maybe an 8.0.

 

sounds about right - until i got to that LRC crease, i was thinking 9.0 or so...........

[nik]

Well I am going a little higher. Overall eye appeal is great, defects seem minor,

 

my grade 8.0

[thedude]

I would say 8.0 as well, nice looking book !

[Silver Surfer]

7.5

 

if the back cover is sharp maybe an 8.0.

 

sounds about right - until i got to that LRC crease, i was thinking 9.0 or so...........

 

I am hoping for a 8.0. While I do not have the book in hand as of yet it sure does look sharp, great spine, corners and cover gloss. This book is going in for grading as soon as I get it.

[divad]

7.5

 

if the back cover is sharp maybe an 8.0.

 

sounds about right - until i got to that LRC crease, i was thinking 9.0 or so...........

 

I am hoping for a 8.0. While I do not have the book in hand as of yet it sure does look sharp, great spine, corners and cover gloss. This book is going in for grading as soon as I get it.

 

SS,

 

My only point about photos, was that often, they assign much more apparent gloss than is actually present, due to high reflectivity. Photos consistently portray a book as looking better than a scan. Scans are

more accurate as to representations of possible defects.

 

-d

[Silver Surfer]

7.5

 

if the back cover is sharp maybe an 8.0.

 

sounds about right - until i got to that LRC crease, i was thinking 9.0 or so...........

 

I am hoping for a 8.0. While I do not have the book in hand as of yet it sure does look sharp, great spine, corners and cover gloss. This book is going in for grading as soon as I get it.

 

SS,

 

My only point about photos, was that often, they assign much more apparent gloss than is actually present, due to high reflectivity. Photos consistently portray a book as looking better than a scan. Scans are

more accurate as to representations of possible defects.

 

-d

 

You are correct sir, if I had this in my possession I would have provided a bigger scan.