Spidey 62 Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 I will never own an Amazing Fantasy 15, but I absolutely could own an ASM #1. My question is, and I am sure it has been asked before but I am having no luck with the search function, assuming that ASM #1 is the 2nd app of Spidey, why doesn't CGC note it on the slab? He is kind of and important character and that is a key book. Thanks, and/or thanks for linking a previous topic that answers the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlowUpTheMoon Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 That's a great question considering CGC notes this appearance as such: MGsimba77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spidey 62 Posted July 20, 2019 Author Share Posted July 20, 2019 28 minutes ago, BlowUpTheMoon said: That's a great question considering CGC notes this appearance as such: Yup.....and this too MGsimba77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kav Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 AF 15 should be considered a cameo appearance as it is not a full story but merely one of the stories of that issue. BOOM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1950's war comics Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 1 hour ago, kav said: AF 15 should be considered a cameo appearance as it is not a full story but merely one of the stories of that issue. BOOM right ! and isn't the guy in AF15 named Peter Parsons or something like that ?? FoggyNelson and kav 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGsimba77 Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 They notated it was the 1st FF crossover but not his 2nd appearance. It's a disgrace I tell you! Seriously though they should consider adding in that piece of information. After 20 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kav Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 26 minutes ago, 1950's war comics said: right ! and isn't the guy in AF15 named Peter Parsons or something like that ?? If I remember correctly it was ASM 1 where he was peter palmer or whatever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blastaar Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 I don’t know why but I always pass up on getting the Fantastic Four Annual #1. It’s still very affordable and an early Spider-Man. Random thought, Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unca Ben Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 (edited) Perhaps the reason it is not noted is because a first issue that's the second appearance of the title character kind of negates the "first issue" status. Why put a notation on a book that actually explains why it's not a mega-key. Some might not consider that a good notation to promote, since it lowers the perceived, not to mention actual, value. edit: the above comes from the view that many CGC notations are there to promote the book Edited July 21, 2019 by Unca Ben added edit bababooey 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
