Please grade my Swamp Thing 20

[Norrin_Radd]

[KingOfRulers]

9.6.

[john72tex]

9.4, miscut cover...

[ComicSupply]

Bottom corner looks blunted bad. 9.2 at best I think.

[jediknight]

it's hard to grade this because you have the contrast set too high. you could have giant corner creases on this but we will never know. I grade this one as a "?".

[Black Hawk]

9.4, miscut cover...

I don't see it.

[Dave_Hennen]

based on the bottom outside and spine of the back cover - 9.2 to maybe 9.0

 

Dave Hennen

[Norrin_Radd]

9.4, miscut cover...

I don't see it.

Me neither.

[SignatureSelect]

The bottom right hand corner is slightly rounded the bottom spine corner is blunted a little 9.2-9.4

[Norrin_Radd]

it's hard to grade this because you have the contrast set too high. you could have giant corner creases on this but we will never know. I grade this one as a "?".

 

What do you mean by contrast?

[Aces]

9.2/9.4

[john72tex]

9.4, miscut cover...

I don't see it.

Me neither.

 

You don't see the long white line running down the spine on the front cover?? Now that I see the creases on the top back cover I'd give this a 9.0.

[Black Hawk]

9.4, miscut cover...

I don't see it.

Me neither.

 

You don't see the long white line running down the spine on the front cover?? Now that I see the creases on the top back cover I'd give this a 9.0.

Yes, technically your right. I just see so many of them cut like this I tend to accept it as being standard. But you are right it is a miscut.

[Nefaria]

 

Yup it's a slight miscut. Also the worst defect I can see is the bottom spine corner, it looks frayed and blunted. 9.0/9.2 Modern

 

Difficult to read posts when your pictures aren't one over the other. Seems like your continually dragging the large horizontal bar back and forth, not only to see the covers but to read the reply's. Contrast does appear high. Looking at the guys on the back

[john72tex]

Back in Eighties, I would avoid miscut comics like the plague when buying current or back issues.