• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Spiderman 300
0

6 posts in this topic

Honestly, probably never. They trust their employees only and thus, must witness any and all signatures. If you want a book slabbed and signed, cons and these new mail in signing events CGC is doing are perfect. Otherwise, what's the harm in enjoying a raw book with a signature? I have many signed books that I keep boarded and displayed in nice top loaders. Just as safe as encasing it, displays great and I can view the signatures (many are on the inside front page) anytime :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, never say never but I hope they never do. The sig series program may not be perfect but it's a hell of a lot more reliable than after the fact authentication which, if you follow signed collectibles in other fields, can be rife with fraud and fakes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Jeffro. said:

Well, never say never but I hope they never do. The sig series program may not be perfect but it's a hell of a lot more reliable than after the fact authentication which, if you follow signed collectibles in other fields, can be rife with fraud and fakes. 

This and exactly this.  I can't quite understand anyone arguing that CGC should start verifying.  Take a look at PSA and the mess of verifying signatures based on an educated opinion and the debate between certain pieces having perceived real or fraudulent signatures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0