PGM DD #4 3 3

[Math Teacher]

Here's my raw copy of Daredevil #4. If it wasn't for the torn-off corner on the back cover, I think that this book would receive a decent grade.

    

[Bayowolf]

You're right..pretty good comic, except for that tear. Without that maybe even a  6.0, with it 2.5 . Wish you could restore it, but don't see how. Could you get a "Qualified" grade?

[Math Teacher]

29 minutes ago, Bayowolf said:

You're right..pretty good comic, except for that tear. Without that maybe even a  6.0, with it 2.5 . Wish you could restore it, but don't see how. Could you get a "Qualified" grade?

Perhaps that would be possible, but my guess that the restoration and grading would outweigh the amount of money I could for which I could sell it. Good idea in practice, but not financially feasible, IMO.

[buddy2]

 With the missing piece, I would expect a 1.5 but I think the front is so nice 2.0/2.5 is possible

[Funnybooks]

2.5

[Albert Thurgood]

I would have given it a 6. I guess I am not a purist as the back cover tear does not worry me much - who needs to see these old ads? If it's slabbed or in mylar the front cover will look great.

Also I think the "Qualified" suggestion was for a "green label" grade. It is not about restoration, but about what the grade would have been if not for a major defect like that tear. I don't think you have to pay extra for that...?

[oldrover]

Too bad about the chunk out. 2.5. 

[Primetime]

2.5

[theCapraAegagrus]

2.5 IMO.

[FoggyNelson]

I have seen a book like this even get a 4.0 because it is structually sound except for the missing piece on back cover which doesn’t,t hurt as much as front cover👍‼️😷

[Deadpoolica]

3.0

[1950's war comics]

i seem to recall one similar to this in a grading contest and was surprised that it still was a VG with that large piece out ...so i can see this being a VG or close to it 

 

[Galen130]

2.5