PGM Amazing Spider-Man 24 4 4

[ComicSpa]

This book looks it’s age. Many defects to list. Let me know. Thx.

[Point Five]

One of my favorite early ASMs.   I'll say solid 4.0.

 

[grendelbo]

3.5/4.0

Let me say I like the way you post pics. First you start off with a good FC shot. I can get a feel for the book as if viewing it from 2 feet away. The you detail quadrants with a good light to catch hard-to-see crease and bends, etc.

Thanks for posting.

[Februus]

4.0 the ragged bottom edge keeps me from a higher grade 

[ComicSpa]

Thanks for the feedback and compliments. I tried to go to the next step and use a scanner without having to pay for anything like storage. I downloaded an app to shrink the photos but when l try to do angles and such it didn’t come out right. I didn’t like the options that the CGC recommended. I’m using an IPad to do my work. I do take allot of pictures so that l can get a true grade. I’m doing this for my clients after l clean, press, or use an aqueous bath (distilled water only) to remove stains.

[MrRoboto]

I would say 4.0 but this is marvel chipping early asm in the 1960s so I would actually go 5.0 with this book.

[Galen130]

On 3/14/2022 at 9:12 PM, grendelbo said:

3.5/4.0

Let me say I like the way you post pics. First you start off with a good FC shot. I can get a feel for the book as if viewing it from 2 feet away. The you detail quadrants with a good light to catch hard-to-see crease and bends, etc.

Thanks for posting.

Yup

[Funnybooks]

4.0

3.5 seems harsh?

On 3/14/2022 at 11:12 PM, grendelbo said:

3.5/4.0

Let me say I like the way you post pics. First you start off with a good FC shot. I can get a feel for the book as if viewing it from 2 feet away. The you detail quadrants with a good light to catch hard-to-see crease and bends, etc.

Thanks for posting.

 

On 3/17/2022 at 3:51 PM, Galen130 said:

Yup

 

On 3/14/2022 at 11:24 PM, Februus said:

4.0 the ragged bottom edge keeps me from a higher grade 

 

[Mars76]

4.5