ComicSpa Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 This book looks it’s age. Many defects to list. Let me know. Thx. Galen130 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Point Five Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 One of my favorite early ASMs. I'll say solid 4.0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendelbo Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 3.5/4.0 Let me say I like the way you post pics. First you start off with a good FC shot. I can get a feel for the book as if viewing it from 2 feet away. The you detail quadrants with a good light to catch hard-to-see crease and bends, etc. Thanks for posting. Point Five 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Februus Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 4.0 the ragged bottom edge keeps me from a higher grade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComicSpa Posted March 15, 2022 Author Share Posted March 15, 2022 Thanks for the feedback and compliments. I tried to go to the next step and use a scanner without having to pay for anything like storage. I downloaded an app to shrink the photos but when l try to do angles and such it didn’t come out right. I didn’t like the options that the CGC recommended. I’m using an IPad to do my work. I do take allot of pictures so that l can get a true grade. I’m doing this for my clients after l clean, press, or use an aqueous bath (distilled water only) to remove stains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrRoboto Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 I would say 4.0 but this is marvel chipping early asm in the 1960s so I would actually go 5.0 with this book. Mars76 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galen130 Posted March 17, 2022 Share Posted March 17, 2022 On 3/14/2022 at 9:12 PM, grendelbo said: 3.5/4.0 Let me say I like the way you post pics. First you start off with a good FC shot. I can get a feel for the book as if viewing it from 2 feet away. The you detail quadrants with a good light to catch hard-to-see crease and bends, etc. Thanks for posting. Yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funnybooks Posted March 22, 2022 Share Posted March 22, 2022 4.0 3.5 seems harsh? On 3/14/2022 at 11:12 PM, grendelbo said: 3.5/4.0 Let me say I like the way you post pics. First you start off with a good FC shot. I can get a feel for the book as if viewing it from 2 feet away. The you detail quadrants with a good light to catch hard-to-see crease and bends, etc. Thanks for posting. On 3/17/2022 at 3:51 PM, Galen130 said: Yup On 3/14/2022 at 11:24 PM, Februus said: 4.0 the ragged bottom edge keeps me from a higher grade Galen130 and grendelbo 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mars76 Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 4.5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...