Ron C. Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 Galen130 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dino-Mutt Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron C. Posted March 19, 2022 Author Share Posted March 19, 2022 I was thinking 1.5. It may not be worth getting graded though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrRoboto Posted March 19, 2022 Share Posted March 19, 2022 On 3/19/2022 at 2:45 PM, Ron C. said: I was thinking 1.5. It may not be worth getting graded though. I agree, that stain takes it from a 2.5 to a 1.5 imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grendelbo Posted March 20, 2022 Share Posted March 20, 2022 2.0 Thanks for sharing. Februus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Februus Posted March 22, 2022 Share Posted March 22, 2022 I’m at 2.0 as well … nasty stain but it’s all there … no pieces missing and that makes a big difference on lower grades grendelbo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funnybooks Posted March 22, 2022 Share Posted March 22, 2022 2.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galen130 Posted March 22, 2022 Share Posted March 22, 2022 1.8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silverage12c Posted March 22, 2022 Share Posted March 22, 2022 2.0, I think. These grading posts are fun. But, when the OP posts very good, close-up pics like these, I think the high-quality images tend to exaggerate the flaws. We're seeing zoomed-in paper fibers and every little defect even better than we might with the book in hand. Leads a lot of us to undergrade, maybe. Funnybooks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilskip Posted March 22, 2022 Share Posted March 22, 2022 I'd go 2.0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
